tightne british english grammar

1 files changed, 8 insertions, 8 deletions

diff --git a/_filter.qmd b/_filter.qmd
index 10fc93c..b746141 100644
--- a/_filter.qmd
+++ b/_filter.qmd
@@ -2,10 +2,10 @@
 
 ## Misparsing and then cleaning up {#sec-misparsing}
 
-Pandoc offers two ways to implement a syntax extension to Markdown.
-Either an import extension or a filter for its AST.
-This project went with the latter approach,
-which may seem like an odd choice at first.
+Pandoc offers two ways to implement a syntax extension to Markdown:
+either an import extension or a filter for its AST.
+This project chose the latter approach,
+which may initially seem unusual.
 
 *TODO: About the approach of parsing as Markdown and adjust the fallout,
 instead of writing an import extension.*
@@ -28,13 +28,13 @@ For one simple test, a Lua implementation had an overhead of 2%
 compared to 35% for a Haskell-based implementation via the JSON interface
 [@MacFarlane2025, section "Introduction"].
 
-While efficiency might be nice,
-user convenience is important in this project.
-General experience using the Pandoc-based Quarto framework indicates,
+While efficiency is desirable,
+user convenience is prioritised in this project.
+General experience using the Pandoc-based Quarto framework indicates
 that non-Lua filters often require additional quirks
 like placement in a specific directory, adding a symbolic link
 or passing its full path,
-whereas Lua filters usually works provided only a relative path.
+whereas Lua filters usually work provided only a relative path.
 That issue might be specific to the Quarto framework,
 but even that aside, Lua-based filters are quite common
 and the documentation for writing them more detailed