blob: c491f8b4efe35bc1c4e9508c6db9f97679afbfb1 (
plain)
[[meta title="proposed new monkeysphere-server subcommand: setup" ]]
What if everything that's done in the package post-installation
scripts (aside from maybe the creation of the monkeysphere user
itself) was done with a single call to something like
monkeysphere-server setup
This would make things more obvious to folks installing from source
directly, and put less maintenance load on porters. The end of
monkeysphere-server setup could also invoke monkeysphere-server diagnostics to get the admin pointed in the right direction.
Think of this as a sort of automated "Getting Started" documentation.
Of course, a hypothetical full setup command would do things like
gen-key , auto-modify sshd_config , etc. We wouldn't want to do
those things automatically without the guiding hand of the local
sysadmin.
But perhaps we could even smooth that process with:
monkeysphere-server setup --full
I'd like to know what other folks think about these possibilities.
Would either of these be useful? Are they confusing? Could they be
clarified?
--dkg
|