summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/website/bugs
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJamie McClelland <jm@mayfirst.org>2008-08-06 12:46:36 -0400
committerJamie McClelland <jm@mayfirst.org>2008-08-06 12:46:36 -0400
commit65bb1dc18f691f341895c44f1078379f8bfee321 (patch)
tree0bb9637887e47204392df40da1c670e33e048b98 /website/bugs
parent6f433d91a492631fc6f3de7023a99eb5f24fec72 (diff)
adding comments to tickets.
Diffstat (limited to 'website/bugs')
-rw-r--r--website/bugs/install-seckey2sshagent-in-usr-bin.mdwn9
-rw-r--r--website/bugs/setup-test-server-for-public.mdwn6
2 files changed, 15 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/website/bugs/install-seckey2sshagent-in-usr-bin.mdwn b/website/bugs/install-seckey2sshagent-in-usr-bin.mdwn
index 8044ce5..e1ca0e4 100644
--- a/website/bugs/install-seckey2sshagent-in-usr-bin.mdwn
+++ b/website/bugs/install-seckey2sshagent-in-usr-bin.mdwn
@@ -10,3 +10,12 @@ I'm not sure I really want to include this hack with the debs. It's really not
As another possibility, I was planning on modifying the script so that it could export to a passprotected file. I think this would be a lot more useful. Let me get that working, then let's revist the issue of including it in the packaging.
-- Big Jimmy.
+
+---
+
+> Ok - sounds good to me. I'm thinking in terms of getting other people to try
+> out the Monkeysphere - maybe the README should just say: we're only half
+> done. You can verify the identity of servers, but we haven't completed the
+> part about verifying you to a server. Then it could say: if you're really
+> interested, you can run this hacky script but we make no guarantees.
+-- Sir Jam Jam
diff --git a/website/bugs/setup-test-server-for-public.mdwn b/website/bugs/setup-test-server-for-public.mdwn
index ca647cb..63ec766 100644
--- a/website/bugs/setup-test-server-for-public.mdwn
+++ b/website/bugs/setup-test-server-for-public.mdwn
@@ -13,3 +13,9 @@ purpose? The test machine wouldn't actually have to do any user
authentication, I guess.
-- Big Jimmy.
+
+> Maybe we should use George? As you point out - it doesn't actually
+> have to do any user authentication. It seems like a waste to have a
+> virtual machine that does nothing but deny people's ssh connections.
+> And - george is already setup and ready to go.
+> -- Sir Jam Jam