diff options
| author | Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> | 2008-08-07 11:50:29 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net> | 2008-08-07 11:50:29 -0400 |
| commit | 304495a5a60d59647c522b2d569391791d4e804f (patch) | |
| tree | f15d3e8c051e5ef08686e10339bdbf6c27272b13 | |
| parent | ae12c7747d637250153b227827c19c851b44280a (diff) | |
reformatting comments in request for published seckey2sshagent
| -rw-r--r-- | website/bugs/install-seckey2sshagent-in-usr-bin.mdwn | 22 |
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/website/bugs/install-seckey2sshagent-in-usr-bin.mdwn b/website/bugs/install-seckey2sshagent-in-usr-bin.mdwn index e1ca0e4..5b19b13 100644 --- a/website/bugs/install-seckey2sshagent-in-usr-bin.mdwn +++ b/website/bugs/install-seckey2sshagent-in-usr-bin.mdwn @@ -5,17 +5,23 @@ much easier for people to use. --- -I'm not sure I really want to include this hack with the debs. It's really not useful for any kind of regular use. I would rather focus on getting openpgp2ssh to support passprotected keys. +I'm not sure I really want to include this hack with the debs. It's +really not useful for any kind of regular use. I would rather focus +on getting openpgp2ssh to support passprotected keys. -As another possibility, I was planning on modifying the script so that it could export to a passprotected file. I think this would be a lot more useful. Let me get that working, then let's revist the issue of including it in the packaging. +As another possibility, I was planning on modifying the script so that +it could export to a passprotected file. I think this would be a lot +more useful. Let me get that working, then let's revist the issue of +including it in the packaging. --- Big Jimmy. +-- Big Jimmy --- -> Ok - sounds good to me. I'm thinking in terms of getting other people to try -> out the Monkeysphere - maybe the README should just say: we're only half -> done. You can verify the identity of servers, but we haven't completed the -> part about verifying you to a server. Then it could say: if you're really -> interested, you can run this hacky script but we make no guarantees. +Ok - sounds good to me. I'm thinking in terms of getting other people to try +out the Monkeysphere - maybe the README should just say: we're only half +done. You can verify the identity of servers, but we haven't completed the +part about verifying you to a server. Then it could say: if you're really +interested, you can run this hacky script but we make no guarantees. + -- Sir Jam Jam |