summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDaniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>2008-08-22 01:55:09 -0400
committerDaniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>2008-08-22 01:55:09 -0400
commit1e3aa94f4676ba9ef76df0235c07dec0b9acdd86 (patch)
treecdaf759712ef91ee908e1b0662884ba51e5303d7
parent48067bbda5a53150ae4810544ead38c06f23c0a3 (diff)
clarifying and linkifying the gnutls announcement.
-rw-r--r--website/news/modified-gnutls-2.4.x-available.mdwn27
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/website/news/modified-gnutls-2.4.x-available.mdwn b/website/news/modified-gnutls-2.4.x-available.mdwn
index d933675..02acbc9 100644
--- a/website/news/modified-gnutls-2.4.x-available.mdwn
+++ b/website/news/modified-gnutls-2.4.x-available.mdwn
@@ -24,12 +24,27 @@ simply allows a "secret" key block to be written *without* storing any
of the secret key material. This is used by GnuPG on the primary key
when the `--export-secret-subkeys` argument is given.
-You can read notes about the GNU S2K extensions in DETAILS from GnuPG,
-which you can fetch this way:
-
- svn co svn://cvs.gnupg.org/gnupg/trunk/doc
- less doc/DETAILS
-
+GnuPG's [DETAILS
+file](http://cvs.gnupg.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/trunk/doc/DETAILS?root=GnuPG)
+describes this extension this way:
+
+ GNU extensions to the S2K algorithm
+ ===================================
+ S2K mode 101 is used to identify these extensions.
+ After the hash algorithm the 3 bytes "GNU" are used to make
+ clear that these are extensions for GNU, the next bytes gives the
+ GNU protection mode - 1000. Defined modes are:
+ 1001 - do not store the secret part at all
+ 1002 - a stub to access smartcards (not used in 1.2.x)
+
+And [`gpg(1)`](http://linux.die.net/man/1/gpg) says of `--export-secret-subkeys`:
+
+
+ \[This\] command has the special property to render the secret
+ part of the primary key useless; this is a GNU extension to
+ OpenPGP and other implementations can not be expected to
+ successfully import such a key.
+
A version of this patch was first proposed [on
`gnutls-dev`](http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnutls-devel/2008-08/msg00005.html),
and looks like it will be adopted upstream in the GnuTLS 2.6.x series,