- \documentclass{article}
- \usepackage{metatron}
- \title{LedgerSMB Coding Standards}
- \author{The LedgerSMB Development Team}
- \begin{document}
- \maketitle
- \tableofcontents
- \section{Introduction}
- Consistent coding style contributes to readability of code. This contributes in
- turn to fewer bugs and easier debugging.
- While consultants which implement custom solutions for their customers are not
- required to follow these coding guidelines, doing so will likely contribute to
- efficiency of the project and, if desired, the likelihood of having the changes
- accepted in the main source tree.
- \section{File Organization and Whitespace}
- Files should be organized according to three principles: atomicity, performance,
- and readability. While there is no stated maximum file size, there is no reason to
- group large amounts of code together when only a small subset of that code will
- be executed on any given run of the program. Similarly, core API for a single
- data structure entity may be grouped together even if each run may touch only a
- small part of the code so that these functions can be maintained together in a
- logical way.
- Nested blocks of code should be indented with a single tab. This way,
- programmers can adjust the tab width of their editors to their preferences.
- Lines longer than 79 characters are not handled well by many terminals and
- should generally be avoided. Continued lines should be indented by one more tab
- than either the line above or below (i.e. if the line above is indented by two
- tabs and the line below by three, indent the continued segment by four).
- Lines longer than 79 characters cause problems in some terminals and should be
- avoided.
- \section{Comments}
- In an ideal world, the code should be sufficiently readable to be
- entirely understandable without comments. Unfortunately, this sort of
- ideal is seldom attained. Comments should be used to annotate code
- and add information that is not already a part of code or programming
- logic itself.
- Comments may include arguments and return values of functions (for
- easy reference), a summary as to why a particular design choice was
- made, or a note to alert future programmers that a particular chunk of
- code deserves additional attention. Comments should not, however,
- merely indicate what the program is doing or how it does something.
- If such comments are required, that is a good indication that a block
- of code requires rewriting.
- Additionally it is a good idea to provide a brief description at the top of each
- file describing, in general terms, what its function is.
- \section{Function Organization}
- Functions should be atomic. While there is no maximum length to functions, long
- functions may be an indication that a function may be non-atomic.
- In general, when more than one line of code is being copied and
- pasted, it should instead be moved into its own function where it can
- be called by all entry points.
- \end{document}
|
