Supporting or switching to MultiMarkdown would take care of a few of the outstanding feature requests. Quoting from the MultiMarkdown site:
MultiMarkdown is a modification of John Gruber's original Markdown.pl file. It uses the same basic syntax, with several additions:
- I have added a basic metadata feature, to allow the inclusion of
metadata within a document that can be used in different ways based
on the output format.
- I have allowed the automatic use of cross-references within a Markdown
document. For instance, you can easily jump to
[the Introduction][Introduction].
- I have incorporated John's proposed syntax for footnotes. Since he
has not determined the output format, I created my own. Mainly, I
wanted to be able to add footnotes to the LaTeX output; I was less
concerned with the XHTML formatting.
- Most importantly, however, I have changed the way that the processed
output is created, so that it is quite simple to export Markdown syntax
to a variety of outputs. By setting the
Format metadata to complete,
you generate a well-formed XHTML page. You can then use XSLT to convert
to virtually any format you like.
MultiMarkdown would solve the BibTex request and the multiple output formats would make the print_link request an easy fix. MultiMarkdown is actively developed and can be found at:
MultiMarkdown Homepage
I don't think MultiMarkdown solves [[the BibTeX request|todo/BibTeX]], but it might solve the request for LaTeX output. --[[JoshTriplett]]
Unless there's a way to disable a zillion of the features, please no. Do not switch to it. One thing that I like about markdown as opposed to most other ASCII markup languages, is that it has at least a bit of moderation on the syntax (although it could be even simpler). There's not a yet another reserved character lurking behind every corner. Not so in multimarkdown anymore. Footnotes, bibliography and internal references I could use, and they do not add any complex syntax: it's all inside the already reserved sequences of bracketed stuff. (If you can even say that ASCII markup languages have reserved sequences, as they randomly decide to interpret stuff, never actually failing on illegal input, like a proper language to write any serious documentation in, would do.) But tables, math, and so on, no thanks! Too much syntax! Syntax overload! Bzzzt! I don't want mischievous syntaxes lurking behind every corner, out to get me. --[[tuomov]]
|
