Let's do an ikiwiki security analysis..
If you are using ikiwiki to render pages that only you can edit, do not
generate any wrappers, and do not use the cgi, then there are no more
security issues with this program than with cat(1). If, however, you let
others edit pages in your wiki, then some possible security issues do need
to be kept in mind.
Probable holes
html attacks
ikiwiki does not attempt to do any santization of the html on the wiki.
[[MarkDown]] allows embedding of arbitrary html into a markdown document. If
you let anyone else edit files on the wiki, then anyone can have fun exploiting
the web browser bug of the day. This type of attack is typically referred
to as an XSS attack (google).
image files etc attacks
If it enounters a file type it does not understand, ikiwiki just copies it
into place. So if you let users add any kind of file they like, they can
upload images, movies, windows executables, css files, etc. If these files exploit security holes in the browser of someone who's viewing the wiki, that can be a security problem.
Of course nobody else seems to worry about this in other wikis, so should we?
web server attacks
If your web server does any parsing of special sorts of files (for example,
server parsed html files), then if you let anyone else add files to the wiki,
they can try to use this to exploit your web server.
symlink attacks
Could a committer trick ikiwiki into following a symlink and operating on
some other tree that it shouldn't? svn supports symlinks, so one can get
into the repo. ikiwiki uses File::Find to traverse the repo, and does not
tell it to follow symlinks, but it might be possible to race replacing a
directory with a symlink and trick it into following.
It would certianly be possible to start out with a directory, let ikiwiki
run and find a file in there, then replace it with a symlink, and ikiwiki
would then go ahead and follow the symlink when it went to open that file
to read it. If it was some private file and was running suid, that could be
bad.
TODO: seems that locking to prevent more than one ikiwiki run at a time
would both fix this and is a good idea in general. With locking, an
attacker couldn't get ikiwiki to svn up while another instance was running.
multiple accessors of wiki source directory
If multiple people can write to the source directory ikiwiki is using, then
one can cause trouble for the other when they run ikiwiki through symlink
attacks.
So it's best if only one person can ever write to the checkout that ikiwiki
compiles the wiki from.
webserver symlink attacks
If someone checks in a symlink to /etc/passwd, ikiwiki would publish that.
To aoid this, ikiwiki will need to avoid reading files that are symlinks.
TODO and note discussion of races above.
Hopefully non-holes
(AKA, the assumptions that will be the root of most security holes...)
exploting ikiwiki with bad content
Someone could add bad content to the wiki and hope to exploit ikiwiki.
Note that ikiwiki runs with perl taint checks on, so this is unlikely.
publishing cgi scripts
ikiwiki does not allow cgi scripts to be published as part of the wiki. Or
rather, the script is published, but it's not marked executable (except in
the case of "destination directory file replacement" below), so hopefully
your web server will not run it.
suid wrappers
ikiwiki --wrapper is intended to generate a wrapper program that
runs ikiwiki to update a given wiki. The wrapper can in turn be made suid,
for example to be used in a [[post-commit]] hook by people who cannot write
to the html pages, etc.
If the wrapper script is made suid, then any bugs in this wrapper would be
security holes. The wrapper is written as securely as I know how, is based
on code that has a history of security use long before ikiwiki, and there's
been no problem yet.
shell exploits
ikiwiki does not expose untrusted data to the shell. In fact it doesn't use
system() at all, and the only use of backticks is on data supplied by the
wiki admin. And it runs with taint checks on of course..
destination directory file replacement
Any file in the destination directory that is a valid page filename can be
replaced, even if it was not originally rendered from a page. For example,
ikiwiki.cgi could be edited in the wiki, and it would write out a
replacement. File permission is preseved. Yipes!
This was fixed by making ikiwiki check if the file it's writing to exists;
if it does then it has to be a file that it's aware of creating before, or
it will refuse to create it.
Still, this sort of attack is something to keep in mind.
cgi data security
When ikiwiki runs as a cgi to edit a page, it is passed the name of the
page to edit. It has to make sure to sanitise this page, to prevent eg,
editing of ../../../foo, or editing of files that are not part of the wiki,
such as subversion dotfiles. This is done by sanitising the filename
removing unallowed characters, then making sure it doesn't start with "/"
or contain ".." or "/.svn/". Annoyingly ad-hoc, this kind of code is where
security holes breed. It needs a test suite at the very least.
cgi password security
Login to the wiki involves sending a password in cleartext over the net.
Cracking the password only allows editing the moo as that user though.
If you care, you can use https, I suppose.
CGI::Session security
I've audited this module and it is massively insecure by default. ikiwiki
uses it in one of the few secure ways; by forcing it to write to a
directory it controls (and not /tmp) and by setting a umask that makes the
file not be world readable.
