diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'doc')
6 files changed, 120 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/doc/bugs/Error:_Your_login_session_has_expired._.mdwn b/doc/bugs/Error:_Your_login_session_has_expired._.mdwn index 046d6e10d..b993cd8e7 100644 --- a/doc/bugs/Error:_Your_login_session_has_expired._.mdwn +++ b/doc/bugs/Error:_Your_login_session_has_expired._.mdwn @@ -41,4 +41,6 @@ Whilst trying to edit http://hugh.vm.bytemark.co.uk/ikiwiki.cgi via OpenID. Any Thanks for you excellent analysis. The bug was due to old pre-3.0 **templates** laying about. After deleting them, ikiwiki defaults to its own templates. Clever. :-) +Great, this saved me big time! It is a google 1st hit. I had the same with accidentally using old templates. Thanks! --[[cstamas]] + [[bugs/done]] diff --git a/doc/bugs/ikiwiki-transition_does_not_set_perl_moduels_path_properly.mdwn b/doc/bugs/ikiwiki-transition_does_not_set_perl_moduels_path_properly.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 000000000..5dd4bc780 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/ikiwiki-transition_does_not_set_perl_moduels_path_properly.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +When installing ikiwiki the perl module path is setup correctly + + use lib '/usr/local/ikiwiki-3.20100312/share/perl/5.10.0'; + +This is not true for ikiwiki-transition: + + $ PATH=/usr/local/ikiwiki-3.20100312/bin ikiwiki-transition prefix_directives ikiwiki.setup + Can't locate IkiWiki.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/perl/5.10.0 + /usr/local/share/perl/5.10.0 /usr/lib/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.10 /usr/share/perl/5.10 /usr/local/lib/site_perl .) + at /usr/local/ikiwiki-3.20100312/bin/ikiwiki-transition line 4. + BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/local/ikiwiki-3.20100312/bin/ikiwiki-transition line 4. + +The missing line should be added. + +Thanks! diff --git a/doc/forum/an_alternative_approach_to_structured_data.mdwn b/doc/forum/an_alternative_approach_to_structured_data.mdwn index 188e627f0..045bfd7aa 100644 --- a/doc/forum/an_alternative_approach_to_structured_data.mdwn +++ b/doc/forum/an_alternative_approach_to_structured_data.mdwn @@ -37,8 +37,12 @@ I have written additional plugins which integrate with the [[plugins/contrib/fie > with different syntaxes while keeping `field` for the > behind-the-scenes bits. > +>> I've started using `field` on a private site and it's working +>> well for me; I'll try to do some code review on its +>> [[plugins/contrib/field/discussion]] page. --s +> > My [[plugins/contrib/album]] plugin could benefit from -> integration with [[field]] for photos' captions and so on, +> integration with `field` for photos' captions and so on, > probably... I'll try to work on that at some point. > > [[plugins/contrib/report]] may be doing too much, though: diff --git a/doc/plugins/contrib/field/discussion.mdwn b/doc/plugins/contrib/field/discussion.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 000000000..fc1759fab --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/plugins/contrib/field/discussion.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@ +Having tried out `field`, some comments (from [[smcv]]): + +The general concept looks great. + +The `pagetemplate` hook seems quite namespace-polluting: on a site containing +a list of books, I'd like to have an `author` field, but that would collide +with IkiWiki's use of `<TMPL_VAR AUTHOR>` for the author of the *page* +(i.e. me). Perhaps it'd be better if the pagetemplate hook was only active for +`<TMPL_VAR FIELD_AUTHOR>` or something? (For those who want the current +behaviour, an auxiliary plugin would be easy.) + +From a coding style point of view, the `$CamelCase` variable names aren't +IkiWiki style, and the `match_foo` functions look as though they could benefit +from being thin wrappers around a common `&IkiWiki::Plugin::field::match` +function (see `meta` for a similar approach). + +I think the documentation would probably be clearer in a less manpage-like +and more ikiwiki-like style? + +If one of my branches from [[todo/allow_plugins_to_add_sorting_methods]] is +accepted, a `field()` cmp type would mean that [[plugins/contrib/report]] can +stop reimplementing sorting. Here's the implementation I'm using, with +your "sortspec" concept (a sort-hook would be very similar): if merged, +I think it should just be part of `field` rather than a separate plugin. + + # Copyright © 2010 Simon McVittie, released under GNU LGPL >= 2.1 + package IkiWiki::Plugin::fieldsort; + use warnings; + use strict; + use IkiWiki 3.00; + use IkiWiki::Plugin::field; + + sub import { + hook(type => "getsetup", id => "fieldsort", call => \&getsetup); + } + + sub getsetup () { + return + plugin => { + safe => 1, + rebuild => undef, + }, + } + + package IkiWiki::PageSpec; + + sub check_cmp_field { + if (!length $_[0]) { + error("sort=field requires a parameter"); + } + } + + sub cmp_field { + my $left = IkiWiki::Plugin::field::field_get_value($_[2], $_[0]); + my $right = IkiWiki::Plugin::field::field_get_value($_[2], $_[1]); + + $left = "" unless defined $left; + $right = "" unless defined $right; + return $left cmp $right; + } + + 1; diff --git a/doc/plugins/contrib/ftemplate/discussion.mdwn b/doc/plugins/contrib/ftemplate/discussion.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 000000000..eb2ec6f13 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/plugins/contrib/ftemplate/discussion.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +I initially thought this wasn't actually necessary - the combination +of [[plugins/template]] with [[plugins/contrib/field]]'s `pagetemplate` +hook ought to provide the same functionality. However, `template` +doesn't run `pagetemplate` hooks; a more general version of this +plugin would be to have a variant of `template` that runs `pagetemplate` +hooks (probably easiest to just patch `template` to implement a +second directive, or have a special parameter `run_hooks="yes"`, +or something). + +Another missing thing is that `ftemplate` looks in +the "system" templates directories, not just in the wiki, but that +seems orthogonal (and might be a good enhancement to `template` anyway). +--[[smcv]] diff --git a/doc/plugins/contrib/report/discussion.mdwn b/doc/plugins/contrib/report/discussion.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 000000000..918d0779b --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/plugins/contrib/report/discussion.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +Wow, this plugin does a lot... it seems to be `inline` (but without the feeds +or the ability to not have `archive="yes"`), plus part of +[[plugins/contrib/trail]], plus some sorting, plus an ingenious workaround +for template evaluation being relatively stateless. + +A large part of this plugin would just fall off if one of the versions of +"[[todo/allow_plugins_to_add_sorting_methods]]" was merged, which was a +large part of the idea of that feature request :-) To make use of that +you'd have to use `pagespec_match_list` in the trail case too, but that's +easy enough - just add `list => [@the_trail_pages]` to the arguments. + +Another large part would fall off if this plugin required, and internally +invoked, `inline` (like my `comments` plugin does) - `inline` runs +`pagetemplate` hooks, and in particular, it'll run the `field` hook. +Alternatively, this plugin could invoke `pagetemplate` hooks itself, +removing the special case for `field`. + +Perhaps the `headers` thing could migrate into inline somehow? That might +lead to making inline too big, though. + +Is the intention that the `trail` part is a performance hack, or a way +to select pages? How does it relate to [[todo/wikitrails]] or +[[plugins/contrib/trail]]? --[[smcv]] |