summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc')
-rw-r--r--doc/bugs/enumerations_of_dates_not_formatted_correctly.mdwn12
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/bugs/enumerations_of_dates_not_formatted_correctly.mdwn b/doc/bugs/enumerations_of_dates_not_formatted_correctly.mdwn
index f9ebf8c13..fe9c5d480 100644
--- a/doc/bugs/enumerations_of_dates_not_formatted_correctly.mdwn
+++ b/doc/bugs/enumerations_of_dates_not_formatted_correctly.mdwn
@@ -29,3 +29,15 @@ Testcase:
> * 27\. March
>
> or by writing "1st January" and so on. --[[smcv]]
+
+>> I think that this is a bug in Text::Markdown (and probably other
+>> versions of markdown). The [markdown spec)(http://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/syntax.text),
+>> though unmaintained and bitrotted into near illegibility, seems to say
+>> that list items can only be preceeded by whitespace:
+>>
+>>> "List markers typically start at the left margin, but may be indented by
+>>> up to three spaces."
+>>
+>> So "* * * 1. 2. 3." should not be parsed as a deeply nested list.
+>>
+>> Forwarded to upsteam RT. [[done]] --[[Joey]]