summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/bugs/inline_sort_order_and_meta_date_value.mdwn
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/bugs/inline_sort_order_and_meta_date_value.mdwn')
-rw-r--r--doc/bugs/inline_sort_order_and_meta_date_value.mdwn14
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/bugs/inline_sort_order_and_meta_date_value.mdwn b/doc/bugs/inline_sort_order_and_meta_date_value.mdwn
index e8befe8d5..6357acdee 100644
--- a/doc/bugs/inline_sort_order_and_meta_date_value.mdwn
+++ b/doc/bugs/inline_sort_order_and_meta_date_value.mdwn
@@ -26,3 +26,17 @@ If I instead include them using creation_year in the pagespec, they are ordered
<http://alcopop.org/~jon/repro2/> contains the src used to reproduce this, the precise ikiwiki invocation (inside Makefile) and the results (dest).
-- [[users/Jon]]
+
+
+> On Ikiwiki 2.53.3 (Debian Lenny), my inlines are also sorted using mtime
+> by default -- despite what the [[documentation|/ikiwiki/directive/inline]]
+> says -- but setting the supposed default sort order manually produces the
+> correct results. For example, the following inline sorts my blog
+> entires using their meta date or ctime:
+>
+> inline pages="blog/*" show="10" sort="age"
+>
+> I'll try to look at the code this weekend and see if age is really the
+> default sort order.
+>
+> -- [David A. Harding](http://dtrt.org), 2008-12-20