diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/plugins/po/discussion.mdwn | 22 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/todo/po:_avoid_rebuilding_to_fix_meta_titles.mdwn | 32 |
2 files changed, 32 insertions, 22 deletions
diff --git a/doc/plugins/po/discussion.mdwn b/doc/plugins/po/discussion.mdwn index 73858c818..50998e822 100644 --- a/doc/plugins/po/discussion.mdwn +++ b/doc/plugins/po/discussion.mdwn @@ -644,28 +644,6 @@ daring a timid "please pull"... or rather, please review again :) >>> need improvements to the deletion UI to de-confuse that. It's fine to >>> put that off until needed --[[Joey]] >> -> * Re the meta title escaping issue worked around by `change`. -> I suppose this does not only affect meta, but other things -> at scan time too. Also, handling it only on rebuild feels -> suspicious -- a refresh could involve changes to multiple -> pages and trigger the same problem, I think. Also, exposing -> this rebuild to the user seems really ugly, not confidence inducing. -> -> So I wonder if there's a better way. Such as making po, at scan time, -> re-run the scan hooks, passing them modified content (either converted -> from po to mdwn or with the escaped stuff cheaply de-escaped). (Of -> course the scan hook would need to avoid calling itself!) -> -> (This doesn't need to block the merge, but I hope it can be addressed -> eventually..) -> -> --[[Joey]] ->> ->> I'll think about it soon. ->> ->> --[[intrigeri]] ->> ->>> Did you get a chance to? --[[Joey]] * As discussed at [[todo/l10n]] the templates needs to be translatable too. They should be treated properly by po4a using the markdown option - at least with my diff --git a/doc/todo/po:_avoid_rebuilding_to_fix_meta_titles.mdwn b/doc/todo/po:_avoid_rebuilding_to_fix_meta_titles.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 000000000..78e8e3ade --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/todo/po:_avoid_rebuilding_to_fix_meta_titles.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@ +Re the meta title escaping issue worked around by `change`. + +> I suppose this does not only affect meta, but other things +> at scan time too. Also, handling it only on rebuild feels +> suspicious -- a refresh could involve changes to multiple +> pages and trigger the same problem, I think. Also, exposing +> this rebuild to the user seems really ugly, not confidence inducing. +> +> So I wonder if there's a better way. Such as making po, at scan time, +> re-run the scan hooks, passing them modified content (either converted +> from po to mdwn or with the escaped stuff cheaply de-escaped). (Of +> course the scan hook would need to avoid calling itself!) +> +> (This doesn't need to block the merge, but I hope it can be addressed +> eventually..) +> +> --[[Joey]] +>> +>> I'll think about it soon. +>> +>> --[[intrigeri]] +>> +>>> Did you get a chance to? --[[Joey]] + +>>>> I eventually did, and got rid of the ugly double rebuild of pages +>>>> at build time. This involved adding a `rescan` hook. Rationale +>>>> and details are in my po branch commit messages. I believe this +>>>> new way of handling meta title escaping to be far more robust. +>>>> Moreover this new implementation is more generic, feels more +>>>> logical to me, and probably fixes other similar bugs outside the +>>>> meta plugin scope. Please have a look when you can. +>>>> --[[intrigeri]] |