diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/bugs/anonok_vs._httpauth.mdwn | 14 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/doc/bugs/anonok_vs._httpauth.mdwn b/doc/bugs/anonok_vs._httpauth.mdwn index 66a68032f..1bf9a3750 100644 --- a/doc/bugs/anonok_vs._httpauth.mdwn +++ b/doc/bugs/anonok_vs._httpauth.mdwn @@ -36,12 +36,12 @@ and a whitelist of OpenIDs in `locked_pages`...) >>> would never see the Signin form. --[[Joey]] >>>> Would I be able to do what I want with a local plugin that ->>>> knows my auth requirements and abuses canedit -- e.g., if the page ->>>> matches */Discussion, redirect to Signin form, else httpauth? --[[schmonz]] +>>>> abuses canedit (and auth) to reach in and call the appropriate +>>>> plugin's auth method -- e.g., if the page matches */Discussion, +>>>> call `openid:auth()`, else `httpauth:auth()`? --[[schmonz]] ->>>>> If you wanted users to need to login with openid or passwordauth ->>>>> for discussion pages, you could do that. That seems it would be ->>>>> annoying for httpauth users (who were not current authed) though, ->>>>> as they would then see the openid signin form. ->>>>> +>>>>> That seems it would be +>>>>> annoying for httpauth users (who were not currently authed), +>>>>> as they would then see the openid signin form when going to edit a +>>>>> Discussion page. >>>>> --[[Joey]] |