summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorjoey <joey@0fa5a96a-9a0e-0410-b3b2-a0fd24251071>2007-01-28 01:11:21 +0000
committerjoey <joey@0fa5a96a-9a0e-0410-b3b2-a0fd24251071>2007-01-28 01:11:21 +0000
commitbea093d3fc700228534caa70aa26500df9d4f6aa (patch)
tree8082b446bb52214a4bb71f3c1f90405e5dde9467 /doc
parent178cd7664c0e0632abc63425fb2111d809921912 (diff)
response
Diffstat (limited to 'doc')
-rw-r--r--doc/about_rcs_backends.mdwn12
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/doc/about_rcs_backends.mdwn b/doc/about_rcs_backends.mdwn
index 8d6c00f9f..6cc8108a7 100644
--- a/doc/about_rcs_backends.mdwn
+++ b/doc/about_rcs_backends.mdwn
@@ -103,7 +103,17 @@ by Ikiwiki.
This approach might be applicable to other distributed VCSs as well, although they're not as oriented
towards transmitting changes with standalone patch bundles (often by email) as darcs is.
-> The mercurial plugin seems to just use one repo and edit it directly - is there some reason that's okay there but not for darcs? I agree with tuomov that having just the one repo would be preferable; the point of a dvcs is that there's no difference between one repo and another. I've got a darcs.pm based on mercurial.pm, that's almost usable... --bma
+> The mercurial plugin seems to just use one repo and edit it directly - is
+> there some reason that's okay there but not for darcs? I agree with tuomov
+> that having just the one repo would be preferable; the point of a dvcs is
+> that there's no difference between one repo and another. I've got a
+> darcs.pm based on mercurial.pm, that's almost usable... --bma
+
+>> IMHO it comes down to whatever works well for a given RCS. Seems like
+>> the darcs approach _could_ be done with most any distributed system, but
+>> it might be overkill for some (or all?) While there is the incomplete darcs
+>> plugin in the [[patchqueue]], if you submit one that's complete, I will
+>> probably accept it into ikiwiki.. --[[Joey]]
## [[Git]]