diff options
author | Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge@gnu.org> | 2009-11-16 09:10:36 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge@gnu.org> | 2009-11-16 09:10:36 +0100 |
commit | 2d1dfab20a6ed69f48c1696e00a97b44eac84062 (patch) | |
tree | b12f95a94b0e8483a9e058c7bbe92fc2dd51d766 /doc | |
parent | 6d73c132804b2c725cea257f5b55e5d438ec5640 (diff) |
Follow up.
Diffstat (limited to 'doc')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/bugs/img_vs_align.mdwn | 12 |
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/bugs/img_vs_align.mdwn b/doc/bugs/img_vs_align.mdwn index c70f4d5ef..6eff46178 100644 --- a/doc/bugs/img_vs_align.mdwn +++ b/doc/bugs/img_vs_align.mdwn @@ -17,3 +17,15 @@ almost of my CSS foo again ;-) it seems.) --[[tschwinge]] > copy of the hurd page to enclose the image in a P, and it still floats. > > Tested with Chromium and Firefox. --[[Joey]] + +>> Uh, sorry for not confirming what I supposed to be with looking into +>> the relevant standard. It just seemed too obvious to me that the +>> closure of `<p>...</p>` would confine whatever embedded stuff may be +>> doing. (Meaning, I didn't expect that the *img*'s alignment would +>> propagate to the *p*'s and would thus be visible from the outside.) +>> +>> I confirm (Firefox, Ubuntu jaunty) that your picture page is being +>> shown correctly -- thus I suppose that there's a buglet in our CSS +>> scripts again... +>> +>> --[[tschwinge]] |