diff options
| author | Joey Hess <joey@kodama.kitenet.net> | 2008-11-17 14:36:00 -0500 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Joey Hess <joey@kodama.kitenet.net> | 2008-11-17 14:36:00 -0500 |
| commit | 345c94dd9d3405ca8f1115f467937872a1941eb0 (patch) | |
| tree | 749f767a26be1e299a24f05250f816ca92bed334 /doc/todo/need_global_renamepage_hook.mdwn | |
| parent | 181bdbe1a9a8a1eb07259466361d98bdc1378499 (diff) | |
response
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/todo/need_global_renamepage_hook.mdwn')
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/todo/need_global_renamepage_hook.mdwn | 11 |
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/todo/need_global_renamepage_hook.mdwn b/doc/todo/need_global_renamepage_hook.mdwn index b7aa44880..8265497ae 100644 --- a/doc/todo/need_global_renamepage_hook.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/need_global_renamepage_hook.mdwn @@ -40,3 +40,14 @@ My proposal is thus: I'm of course volunteering to implement this, or anything related that would solve my problem. Hmmm? --[[intrigeri]] + +> I think it would be better to have a different hook that is called for +> renames, since the two hook actions are very different (unlike the +> preprocess hook, which does a very similar thing in scan mode). +> +> Just calling it `rename` seems like a reasonable name, by analogy with +> the `delete` and `change` hooks. +> +> It might make sense to rename `renamepage` to `renamelink` to make it +> clearer what it does. (I'm not very worried about this breaking things, at +> this point.) --[[Joey]] |