diff options
author | Joey Hess <joey@gnu.kitenet.net> | 2009-04-04 17:27:48 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Joey Hess <joey@gnu.kitenet.net> | 2009-04-04 17:27:48 -0400 |
commit | 8e92468eae9ac0ab8161a0c71ff6c6a0a8aef07a (patch) | |
tree | 9e26465e0ca98a5f3cbc6c72a0cace4bf83b93db /doc/todo/clear_page_to_delete.mdwn | |
parent | 78a69e5bd632eb86ef8135e9c1d05d2c48b43362 (diff) | |
parent | 08fda4c9d374de1d3de3172a192d4d915d3dc0c1 (diff) |
Merge branch 'master'
Conflicts:
doc/ikiwiki-makerepo.mdwn
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/todo/clear_page_to_delete.mdwn')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/todo/clear_page_to_delete.mdwn | 33 |
1 files changed, 33 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/todo/clear_page_to_delete.mdwn b/doc/todo/clear_page_to_delete.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 000000000..6bab6ef27 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/todo/clear_page_to_delete.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ +Would it make sense to automatically delete a page if it's edited and +cleared to be entirely empty (or only have whitespace)? Discuss. --[[Joey]] + + I'd say so; yes. A method of deleting pages via the web would be great; I +can't think of a use of keeping blank pages around. What about vandalism -- +if someone blanks a page and deletes it and someone else wishes to restore +it; or is undoing edits via the web a bigger issue? -- [[users/Jon]] + +Of course there's already a way to delete pages (remove plugin). So the +question is really: + +* Does it make sense to have a second way to do it, by clearing the page? +* Should it be enabled even if the full remove plugin isn't? + +Re vandalism in general, I am generally happy using git-revert to kill the +offending change. --[[Joey]] + +I don't think we need a second way to delete pages, which would probably be +used by the only few people who will learn it's possible by random +documentation reading, find it useful, *and* remember it. -- [[intrigeri]] + +On the other hand, clearing the page's whole content essentially means deleting +the page. That's what the user intended to do in this case. The information +content of an empty vs. a deleted page is essentially the same, I'd say. But +having ikiwiki remove those stale pages would save some (minimal, admittedly) +time needed for manual clean-up. --[[tschwinge]] + +On EmacsWiki, a page is marked for deletion when it contains just the DeletedPage +keyword and if there were no page editions since XX days. Here, I use pages that +can be empty everyday and filled all day long. It does not make sense to me to +delete these pages :). --[[xma]] + +I was not aware of [[plugins/remove]]. I don't think another method is necessary -- [[users/Jon]] |