diff options
author | http://smcv.pseudorandom.co.uk/ <http://smcv.pseudorandom.co.uk/@web> | 2010-03-30 12:10:40 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Joey Hess <joey@finch.kitenet.net> | 2010-03-30 12:10:40 +0000 |
commit | 0503bf7c8824d941b26da4c91b4ee1f721fcf54c (patch) | |
tree | 7772647f90c2f3fccbb69dcd294ffb7774067eaf /doc/plugins | |
parent | 026355cfa24dc911a247dcafca10c6ea74ae515b (diff) |
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/plugins')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/plugins/contrib/ftemplate/discussion.mdwn | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/doc/plugins/contrib/ftemplate/discussion.mdwn b/doc/plugins/contrib/ftemplate/discussion.mdwn index de4b35ef0..6a1d9f685 100644 --- a/doc/plugins/contrib/ftemplate/discussion.mdwn +++ b/doc/plugins/contrib/ftemplate/discussion.mdwn @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ or something). >> uses `HTML::Template` but *doesn't* run `pagetemplate` hooks? >> >> It just seems strange to me that `field` needs to have its own ->> of `template` (this), its own variant of `inline` (`report`), +>> variant of `template` (this), its own variant of `inline` (`report`), >> and so on - I'd tend to lean more towards having `field` >> enhance the existing plugins. I'm not an ikiwiki committer, >> mind... Joey, your opinion would be appreciated! --[[smcv]] |