diff options
author | Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk> | 2010-08-27 10:01:58 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jonas Smedegaard <dr@jones.dk> | 2010-08-27 10:01:58 +0200 |
commit | f398ad035b973608d380c9939ea845d8e2a0cdc2 (patch) | |
tree | 1ba1a0c94e375ab8ed609eaa57a542c6b87de5a8 /doc/plugins/contrib/ftemplate/discussion.mdwn | |
parent | 958e5735c946263a111420fe47abe58782581e8c (diff) | |
parent | 6d213a0c739d5b34357b01a616f99197eeba6ad9 (diff) |
Merge branch 'master' of git://git.ikiwiki.info
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/plugins/contrib/ftemplate/discussion.mdwn')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/plugins/contrib/ftemplate/discussion.mdwn | 33 |
1 files changed, 33 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/plugins/contrib/ftemplate/discussion.mdwn b/doc/plugins/contrib/ftemplate/discussion.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 000000000..1e0bca5d8 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/plugins/contrib/ftemplate/discussion.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ +I initially thought this wasn't actually necessary - the combination +of [[plugins/template]] with [[plugins/contrib/field]]'s `pagetemplate` +hook ought to provide the same functionality. However, `template` +doesn't run `pagetemplate` hooks; a more general version of this +plugin would be to have a variant of `template` that runs `pagetemplate` +hooks (probably easiest to just patch `template` to implement a +second directive, or have a special parameter `run_hooks="yes"`, +or something). + +> I got the impression that `pagetemplate` hooks are intended to be completely independent of `template` variables; page-template is for the actual `page.tmpl` template, while `template` is for other templates which are used inside the page content. So I don't understand why one would need a run_hooks option. --[[KathrynAndersen]] + +>> `Render`, `inline`, `comments` and `recentchanges` run `pagetemplate` +>> hooks, as does anything that uses `IkiWiki::misctemplate`. From that +>> quick survey, it seems as though `template` is the only thing that +>> uses `HTML::Template` but *doesn't* run `pagetemplate` hooks? +>> +>> It just seems strange to me that `field` needs to have its own +>> variant of `template` (this), its own variant of `inline` (`report`), +>> and so on - I'd tend to lean more towards having `field` +>> enhance the existing plugins. I'm not an ikiwiki committer, +>> mind... Joey, your opinion would be appreciated! --[[smcv]] + +>>> I did it that way basically because I needed the functionality ASAP, and I didn't want to step on anyone's toes, so I made them as separate plugins. If Joey wants to integrate the functionality into IkiWiki proper, I would be very happy, but I don't want to put pressure on him. --[[KathrynAndersen]] + +Another missing thing is that `ftemplate` looks in +the "system" templates directories, not just in the wiki, but that +seems orthogonal (and might be a good enhancement to `template` anyway). +--[[smcv]] + +> Yes, I added that because I wanted the option of not having to make all my templates work as wiki pages also. --[[KathrynAndersen]] + +>> Joey has added support for +>> [[todo/user-defined_templates_outside_the_wiki]] now. --s |