summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/forum
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJoey Hess <joey@gnu.kitenet.net>2009-10-16 12:18:20 -0400
committerJoey Hess <joey@gnu.kitenet.net>2009-10-16 12:18:20 -0400
commit7e987bbfeeea0d93a7d636de5124ecf15ef730be (patch)
treea8508a8ace3b7736082fe05585a59b9cca0fe73a /doc/forum
parentd216a27e0c448447f798883a4d6692d1a51677ef (diff)
parent4c9ded61db6baf9a5cbd7342055b9ad783ca2351 (diff)
Merge branch 'master' of ssh://git.ikiwiki.info/srv/git/ikiwiki.info
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/forum')
-rw-r--r--doc/forum/ever-growing_list_of_pages.mdwn19
1 files changed, 19 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/forum/ever-growing_list_of_pages.mdwn b/doc/forum/ever-growing_list_of_pages.mdwn
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..85a39e107
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/forum/ever-growing_list_of_pages.mdwn
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+What is overyone's idea about the ever-growing list of pages in bugs/ etc.?
+Once linked to `done`, they're removed from the rendered [[bugs]] page -- but
+they're still present in the repository.
+
+Shouldn't there be some clean-up at some point for those that have been
+resolved? Or should all of them be kept online forever?
+
+Likewise, for example in [[forum/ikiwiki__39__s_notion_of_time]], should one
+remove the text about the implementation bug that has been fixed, or should it
+stay there, for reference?
+
+--[[tschwinge]]
+
+> To answer a question with a question, what harm does having the done bugs
+> around cause? At some point in the future perhaps the number of done pages
+> will be large enough to be a time or space concern. Do you think we've
+> reached a point now? One advantage of having them around is that people
+> running older versions of the Ikiwiki software may find the page explaining
+> that the bug is fixed if they perform a search. -- [[Jon]]