summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/bugs
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJoey Hess <joey@gnu.kitenet.net>2010-01-04 20:22:32 -0500
committerJoey Hess <joey@gnu.kitenet.net>2010-01-04 20:22:32 -0500
commitf5bdfc29ee32446fcad4ad2ccc82e109445f4755 (patch)
tree8bd76e5bcd24d76d6c0aa392dde1bddc5da8529c /doc/bugs
parentf96a7b775617596f16252f9b8be7cf1761c24da0 (diff)
response
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/bugs')
-rw-r--r--doc/bugs/anonok_vs._httpauth.mdwn7
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/bugs/anonok_vs._httpauth.mdwn b/doc/bugs/anonok_vs._httpauth.mdwn
index 57ab95985..66a68032f 100644
--- a/doc/bugs/anonok_vs._httpauth.mdwn
+++ b/doc/bugs/anonok_vs._httpauth.mdwn
@@ -38,3 +38,10 @@ and a whitelist of OpenIDs in `locked_pages`...)
>>>> Would I be able to do what I want with a local plugin that
>>>> knows my auth requirements and abuses canedit -- e.g., if the page
>>>> matches */Discussion, redirect to Signin form, else httpauth? --[[schmonz]]
+
+>>>>> If you wanted users to need to login with openid or passwordauth
+>>>>> for discussion pages, you could do that. That seems it would be
+>>>>> annoying for httpauth users (who were not current authed) though,
+>>>>> as they would then see the openid signin form.
+>>>>>
+>>>>> --[[Joey]]