summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/bugs
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJoey Hess <joey@kitenet.net>2010-05-01 15:27:32 -0400
committerJoey Hess <joey@kitenet.net>2010-05-01 15:27:32 -0400
commit3252df4aa8a35495bbaa8280ca13a545285e6192 (patch)
treeb172c65bbdd206d50980936b033d4f2384a46340 /doc/bugs
parent6293c62cac02fdc604f12db71462ee3f1af18f1d (diff)
comments, branch review, questions
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/bugs')
-rw-r--r--doc/bugs/html5_support.mdwn63
1 files changed, 63 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/bugs/html5_support.mdwn b/doc/bugs/html5_support.mdwn
index 239474275..5d2a41303 100644
--- a/doc/bugs/html5_support.mdwn
+++ b/doc/bugs/html5_support.mdwn
@@ -9,10 +9,67 @@ HTML5](http://www.w3.org/TR/html5-diff/).
* [ikiwiki instance with HTML5 templates](http://natalian.org)
* [HTML5 outliner tool](http://gsnedders.html5.org/outliner/) -- to check you have the structure of your markup correct
+> Kai, thanks enormously for working on this. I switched a page to
+> the html5 doctype today, and was rather pleasently suprised that it
+> validated, except for the new Cache-Control meta tag. Now I see you're
+> well ahead of me. --[[Joey]]
+>
+> So, how should ikiwiki support html5? There are basically 3 approaches:
+>
+> 1. Allow users to add html5 tags to their existing xhtml pages.
+> What has been done so far, can be extended. Basically works
+> in browsers, if you don't care about standards. A good prerequisite
+> for anything else, anyway.
+> 2. Switch to html5 in eg, ikiwiki 4; users have to deal with
+> any custom markup on their pages/templates that breaks then.
+> 3. Have both a html5 and a xhtml mode, allow user to select.
+>
+> The third option seems fairly tractable from what I see here and in
+> your branch. You made only relatively minor changes to 10 templates.
+> It would probably not be too dreadful to put them in ifdefs.
+>
+> Some of your changes are obvious, like using the new `time` and
+> and `article` elements. Others less so, and I'm particularly
+> puzzled by these:
+>
+> * Removing the value="Submit" from the button on the
+> commentmoderation form.
+> * Removing feedlink.tmpl. What?!
+> * Using a `h2` for the header of inlinepage.tmpl and page.tmpl, rather
+> than the styled span. Ikiwiki has
+> [[a_reason|todo/Option_to_make_title_an_h1?]] for not
+> using real `hN` for the header atop a page and here.
+> AFAICS, html5 does not invalidate that.
+> * Removing Editurl from inlinepage.tmpl actions. I assume
+> this is your own preference, needs to be removed from branch
+> before I can use it.
+> * Removing the pageheader, content, and footer divs
+> which are all used by style.css.
+> Perhaps, the style sheet needs to be updated to use
+> the new elements, like the `footer` and `header`.
+> * Removal of the favicon from page.tmpl. Surely html5 supports?
+> * Removal of BASEURL from page.tmpl, apparently a mistake.
+> * Removal of the `/` between wiki title and page title.
+> Personal preference.
+> * Removal of `comments` div, which is there to be styled.
+> * Why use a `p` rather than the `div` for `addcomments`?
+> * Moving the action bar to the bottom of the page.
+> Personal preference.
+> * Clearly searchquery.tmpl has no business using bad old `center`
+> tag, but something should still be done to replace it.
+>
+> (BTW, it would be helpful if you could re-merge master into your branch
+> as it is a bit diverged now.) --[[Joey]]
+
# htmlscrubber.pm needs to not scrub new HTML5 elements
* [new elements](http://www.w3.org/TR/html5-diff/#new-elements)
+> Most of these can be supported trivially, since they are just semantic
+> markup. Make a list of these, and their attributes (and which attributes
+> can contain urls or other javascript injection mechanisms), and I can add
+> them. Others, like `embed`, and `canvas` are *scary*. --[[Joey]]
+
# HTML5 Validation and t/html.t
[validator.nu](http://validator.nu/) is the authorative HTML5 validator,
@@ -25,6 +82,9 @@ In the future, hopefully ikiwiki can test for valid HTML5 using [Relax NG
schema](http://syntax.whattf.org/) using a Debian package tool
[rnv](http://packages.qa.debian.org/r/rnv.html).
+> Validation in the test suite is nice, but I am willing to lose those
+> tests for a while. --[[Joey]]
+
# HTML5 migration issues
# [article](http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/semantics.html#the-article-element) element
@@ -45,3 +105,6 @@ As a workaround:
au:~% grep timeformat natalian.setup
timeformat => '%Y-%m-%d',
+
+> Also, the [[plugins/relativedate]] plugin needs to be updated to
+> support relatatizing the contents of time elements. --[[Joey]]