summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJon Dowland <jmtd@debian.org>2010-05-18 11:47:28 +0100
committerJon Dowland <jmtd@debian.org>2010-05-18 11:47:28 +0100
commitc71ea2337d56b7fe7fde7a4b2fb43a510fb5f05f (patch)
treeaf85e08308c82f3c565465d902b7788429fa8494
parent284038fbbf09a55ae23ebeca03f8ff4487ce7ef6 (diff)
response: shortcomings
-rw-r--r--doc/forum/ikiwiki_development_environment_tips.mdwn14
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/forum/ikiwiki_development_environment_tips.mdwn b/doc/forum/ikiwiki_development_environment_tips.mdwn
index 9fa3595ed..32da4a1cd 100644
--- a/doc/forum/ikiwiki_development_environment_tips.mdwn
+++ b/doc/forum/ikiwiki_development_environment_tips.mdwn
@@ -3,3 +3,17 @@ I haven't settled on a comfortable/flexible/quick development environment for ha
Does anyone have a comfortable setup or tips they would like to share? -- [[Jon]]
> I've just been setting `libdir` in an existing wiki's setup file. When the plugin's in a decent state, I copy it over to a git checkout and commit. For the plugins I've been working on (auth and VCS), this has been just fine. Are you looking for something more? --[[schmonz]]
+
+>> I think this suffers from two problems. Firstly, unless you are tracking git
+>> master in your existing wiki, there's the possibility that your plugin will
+>> not work with a more modern version of ikiwiki (or that it would benefit
+>> from using a newly added utility subroutine or similar). Second, sometimes I
+>> find that even writing a plugin can involve making minor changes outside of
+>> the plugin code (bug fixes, or moving functionality about). So, I think
+>> having some kind of environment built around a git checkout is best.
+>>
+>> However, this does not address the issue of the tedium writing/maintaining a
+>> setup file for testing things.
+>>
+>> I think I might personally benefit from a more consistent environment (I
+>> move from machine-to-machine frequently). -- [[Jon]]