diff options
| author | intrigeri <intrigeri@boum.org> | 2010-08-02 16:00:37 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | intrigeri <intrigeri@boum.org> | 2010-08-02 16:00:37 +0200 |
| commit | c5b052cbbda14c5c33127890d4a9842b8dee826a (patch) | |
| tree | 25788be549bd49727a7bafc2172af569e2101fcf | |
| parent | 97a706f73ce2cedc8fd8a9bbeea6d25783260b2e (diff) | |
explored possible ways to do it, got trapped.
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/todo/po:_remove_po_files_when_disabling_plugin.mdwn | 7 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/todo/po:_remove_po_files_when_disabling_plugin.mdwn b/doc/todo/po:_remove_po_files_when_disabling_plugin.mdwn index 26b1964ba..0801f7fcd 100644 --- a/doc/todo/po:_remove_po_files_when_disabling_plugin.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/po:_remove_po_files_when_disabling_plugin.mdwn @@ -2,3 +2,10 @@ ikiwiki now has a `disable` hook. Should the po plugin remove the po files from the source repository when it has been disabled? > pot files, possibly, but the po files contain work, so no. --[[Joey]] + +>> I tried to implement this in my `po-disable` branch, but AFAIK, the +>> current rcs plugins interface provides no way to tell whether a +>> given file (e.g. a POT file in my case) is under version control; +>> in most cases, it is not, thanks to .gitignore or similar, but we +>> can't be sure. So I just can't decide it is needed to call +>> `rcs_remove` rather than a good old `unlink`. --[[intrigeri]] |