summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorhttp://smcv.pseudorandom.co.uk/ <http://smcv.pseudorandom.co.uk/@web>2010-04-03 00:12:59 +0000
committerJoey Hess <joey@finch.kitenet.net>2010-04-03 00:12:59 +0000
commitaec7dec2795aedfe1f13cff9a888bed83ee760df (patch)
treee77cddc37ff0c868e335b09328437772fc38db86
parent011fe920d162924876170d167be11dc64cf8be2f (diff)
make questions to Joey more explicit
-rw-r--r--doc/todo/allow_plugins_to_add_sorting_methods.mdwn13
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/doc/todo/allow_plugins_to_add_sorting_methods.mdwn b/doc/todo/allow_plugins_to_add_sorting_methods.mdwn
index 156678da7..36c134a59 100644
--- a/doc/todo/allow_plugins_to_add_sorting_methods.mdwn
+++ b/doc/todo/allow_plugins_to_add_sorting_methods.mdwn
@@ -36,9 +36,9 @@ That earlier version of the branch is also available for comparison:
>>>>> introducing "sort spec" in the API. I took a cue from
>>>>> [[ikiwiki/pagespec/sorting]] being a subpage of
>>>>> [[ikiwiki/pagespec]], and decided that yes, sorting is
->>>>> a bit like a pagespec :-) --s
+>>>>> a bit like a pagespec :-) Which name would you prefer? --s
->>>> I would be inclined to drop the `check_` stuff.
+>>>> I would be inclined to drop the `check_` stuff. --J
>>>>> It basically exists to support `title_natural`, to avoid
>>>>> firing up the whole import mechanism on every `cmp`
@@ -50,10 +50,10 @@ That earlier version of the branch is also available for comparison:
>>>>>
>>>>> The former function could be achieved at a small
>>>>> compatibility cost by putting `title_natural` in a new
->>>>> sortnatural plugin (that fails to load if you don't
+>>>>> `sortnatural` plugin (that fails to load if you don't
>>>>> have `title_natural`), if you'd prefer - that's what would
>>>>> have happened if `title_natural` was written after this
->>>>> code had been merged, I suspect. --s
+>>>>> code had been merged, I suspect. Would you prefer this? --s
>>>> Wouldn't it make sense to have `meta(title)` instead
>>>> of `meta_title`? --J
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ That earlier version of the branch is also available for comparison:
>>>> "ascending age" both seem useful to be able to explicitly specify.
>>>> --[[Joey]]
->>>>> Perhaps. I do like the simplicity of [[KathyrnAndersen]]'s syntax
+>>>>> Perhaps. I do like the simplicity of [[KathrynAndersen]]'s syntax
>>>>> from [[plugins/contrib/report]] (which I copied verbatim, except for
>>>>> turning sort-by-`field` into a parameterized spec), and I can't really
>>>>> think of any sensible way to combine sort specs other than "sort by a,
@@ -130,7 +130,8 @@ That earlier version of the branch is also available for comparison:
>>>>> voltage, with more or less recently updated pages being said to have
>>>>> more or less updateage. I don't know whether that's good or bad :-)
>>>>>
->>>>> I'm sure there's a much better word, but I can't see it. --s
+>>>>> I'm sure there's a much better word, but I can't see it. Do you have
+>>>>> a better idea? --s
## Documentation from sort-package branch