diff options
| author | Joey Hess <joey@gnu.kitenet.net> | 2009-10-02 18:58:07 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Joey Hess <joey@gnu.kitenet.net> | 2009-10-02 18:58:07 -0400 |
| commit | 9673806a6d94b320bf2289dd091175a742bcee26 (patch) | |
| tree | 8f2d770aaaebe5f503cc8e33b404ffc250e90c7f | |
| parent | db64972b65c7504b6d2bbed69e438203eef0a518 (diff) | |
consistency with edittemplate?
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/todo/Set_templates_for_whole_sections_of_the_site.mdwn | 8 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/doc/todo/Set_templates_for_whole_sections_of_the_site.mdwn b/doc/todo/Set_templates_for_whole_sections_of_the_site.mdwn index ed9740068..b9c397358 100644 --- a/doc/todo/Set_templates_for_whole_sections_of_the_site.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/Set_templates_for_whole_sections_of_the_site.mdwn @@ -8,4 +8,10 @@ I've written a new plugin, sectiontemplate, available in the `page_tmpl` branch > Before I do though, would it perhaps make sense to merge > this in with the pagetemplate plugin? They do such a similar thing, > and unless letting users control the template by editing a page is not -> wanted, I can't see any reason not to combine them. --[[Joey]] +> wanted, I can't see any reason not to combine them. --[[Joey]] + +> One other idea is moving the pagespec from setup file to a directive. +> The edittemplate plugin does that, and it might be nice +> to be consistent with that. To implement it, you'd have to +> make the scan hook store the template pagespecs in `%pagestate`, +> so a bit more complicated. --[[Joey]] |