diff options
author | Joey Hess <joey@kodama.kitenet.net> | 2007-11-13 15:43:54 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | Joey Hess <joey@kodama.kitenet.net> | 2007-11-13 15:43:54 -0500 |
commit | 335942c0ea3b3e0b3fa286592ffee55873c7f9a2 (patch) | |
tree | e10d657cc6d024ce036860a3819685b6c7c9ea86 | |
parent | c3b0e5fd035d82472408fd75b8f604ae95a88fe0 (diff) |
silly markdown
-rw-r--r-- | doc/bugs/search_for_locale_data_in_the_installed_location.mdwn | 4 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | doc/todo/Allow_web_edit_form_comment_field_to_be_mandatory.mdwn | 2 |
2 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/doc/bugs/search_for_locale_data_in_the_installed_location.mdwn b/doc/bugs/search_for_locale_data_in_the_installed_location.mdwn index 6a4bd03a6..a7fab5571 100644 --- a/doc/bugs/search_for_locale_data_in_the_installed_location.mdwn +++ b/doc/bugs/search_for_locale_data_in_the_installed_location.mdwn @@ -15,8 +15,8 @@ It seems like gettext only searches for locale information in /usr/share/locale, -- [[ThomasBleher]] > According to my testing, this patch makes ikiwiki's localisation fail for -> LANG=fr_FR when everything is installed to the default locations, -> though LANG=es_ES works. I don't understand this behavior, especially +> `LANG=fr_FR` when everything is installed to the default locations, +> though `LANG=es_ES` works. I don't understand this behavior, especially > since strace shows it successfully opening the file > `/usr/share/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/ikiwiki.mo`. > diff --git a/doc/todo/Allow_web_edit_form_comment_field_to_be_mandatory.mdwn b/doc/todo/Allow_web_edit_form_comment_field_to_be_mandatory.mdwn index 40c0e79b8..9382056da 100644 --- a/doc/todo/Allow_web_edit_form_comment_field_to_be_mandatory.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/Allow_web_edit_form_comment_field_to_be_mandatory.mdwn @@ -9,6 +9,6 @@ In our team internal wiki, we wish to impose a policy that all edits must have a > I don't feel this belongs in ikiwiki core, but would accept a plugin that > does it. I think that can be done using a formbuilder_setup hook. -> BTW, it wmuld probably be better to validate against a comment_regexp, +> BTW, it wuld probably be better to validate against a `comment_regexp`, > so that when the evil admins notice that /.+/ is absurdly easy for users > to get around (by using " "), they can tighten it down. --[[Joey]] |