diff options
author | Joey Hess <joey@kodama.kitenet.net> | 2008-10-26 20:13:14 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Joey Hess <joey@kodama.kitenet.net> | 2008-10-26 20:13:14 -0400 |
commit | 1e561f8b5fc78dbc3675dde30fea396a3590a2b5 (patch) | |
tree | 82f80a0e6ba9aaa69c191ffdc6212bce9008d88a | |
parent | a4ddf1e5041ac76e57fb61df687217b491c32e75 (diff) |
another thought
-rw-r--r-- | doc/todo/syntax_highlighting.mdwn | 31 |
1 files changed, 29 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/doc/todo/syntax_highlighting.mdwn b/doc/todo/syntax_highlighting.mdwn index fec3f963f..041d92b13 100644 --- a/doc/todo/syntax_highlighting.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/syntax_highlighting.mdwn @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Ideally, it should support both converting whole source files into wiki pages, as well as doing syntax highlighting as a preprocessor directive (which is either passed the text, or reads it from a file). -The big list of possibilities: +## The big list of possibilities * [[plugins/contrib/highlightcode]] uses [[cpan Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate]], operates on whole source files only, has a few bugs (see @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ The big list of possibilities: also uses src-highlight, and operates on whole source files. Has problems with [[bugs/multiple_pages_with_same_name]]. -General problems: +## General problems * Using non-perl syntax highlighting backends is slow. I'd prefer either using a perl module, or a multiple-backend solution that can use a perl @@ -60,3 +60,30 @@ General problems: Not clear how to fix this, as ikiwiki is very oriented toward file extensions. The workaround is to use a directive on a wiki page, pulling in the Makefile. + +## format directive + +Rather than making syntax highlight plugins have to provide a preprocessor +directive as well as handling whole source files, perhaps a generic format +directive could be used: + + \[[!format pl """..."""]] + +That would run the text through the pl htmlizer, from the syntax hightligh +plugin. OTOH, if "rst" were given, it would run the text through the rst +htmlizer. So, more generic, allows mixing different types of markup on one +page, as well as syntax highlighting. Does require specifying the type of +format, instead of allows it to be guessed (which some syntax highlighters +can do). + +Hmm, this would also allow comments inside source files to have mdwn +embedded in them, without making the use of mdwn a special case, or needing +to postprocess the syntax highlighter output to find comments. + + /* \[[!format mdwn """ + + This is a comment in my C file. You can use mdwn in here. + + """]] */ + +Note that this assumes that directives are expanded in source files. |