diff options
author | Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net> | 2008-07-17 15:50:25 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net> | 2008-07-17 15:50:25 -0400 |
commit | 1b46f52043aa6eff37da3677d7bdf11944b733ab (patch) | |
tree | d4d0ee578f60c181cb987480b2cd7447e6639646 | |
parent | 226c4acfea9619392a5cc6f79c632670d9f0cd7c (diff) |
web commit by http://jcflack.myopenid.com/
-rw-r--r-- | doc/todo/plugin.mdwn | 13 |
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/todo/plugin.mdwn b/doc/todo/plugin.mdwn index 4efc24e1c..c2322f788 100644 --- a/doc/todo/plugin.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/plugin.mdwn @@ -19,6 +19,19 @@ Suggestions of ideas for plugins: to selectively add to the set of files in the working copy that the edit CGI will consider editable? --ChapmanFlack 17July2008 + > It looks like 80% of the job would be accomplished by hooking `htmlize` for + > the `.xml` extension. That would satisfy the `pagetype` test that causes + > the edit CGI to say `not an editable page`. (That happens too early for a + > `canedit` hook.) The `htmlize` hook could just + > copy in to out unchanged (this is an internal wiki, I'm not thinking hard + > about evil XML content right now). For extra credit, an `editcontent` hook + > could validate the XML. (Can an `editcontent` hook signal a content error?) + + > The tricky bit seems to be to register the fact that the target file should + > have extension `.xml` and not `.html`. Maybe what's needed is a generalized + > notion of an `htmlize` hook, one that specifies its output extension as well + > as its input, and isn't assumed to produce html? --ChapmanFlack 17July2008 + * list of registered users - tricky because it sorta calls for a way to rebuild the page when a new user is registered. Might be better as a cgi? > At best, this could only show the users who have logged in, not all > permitted by the current auth plugin(s). HTTP auth would need |