summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/website
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDaniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>2008-08-07 11:50:29 -0400
committerDaniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>2008-08-07 11:50:29 -0400
commit304495a5a60d59647c522b2d569391791d4e804f (patch)
treef15d3e8c051e5ef08686e10339bdbf6c27272b13 /website
parentae12c7747d637250153b227827c19c851b44280a (diff)
reformatting comments in request for published seckey2sshagent
Diffstat (limited to 'website')
-rw-r--r--website/bugs/install-seckey2sshagent-in-usr-bin.mdwn22
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/website/bugs/install-seckey2sshagent-in-usr-bin.mdwn b/website/bugs/install-seckey2sshagent-in-usr-bin.mdwn
index e1ca0e4..5b19b13 100644
--- a/website/bugs/install-seckey2sshagent-in-usr-bin.mdwn
+++ b/website/bugs/install-seckey2sshagent-in-usr-bin.mdwn
@@ -5,17 +5,23 @@ much easier for people to use.
---
-I'm not sure I really want to include this hack with the debs. It's really not useful for any kind of regular use. I would rather focus on getting openpgp2ssh to support passprotected keys.
+I'm not sure I really want to include this hack with the debs. It's
+really not useful for any kind of regular use. I would rather focus
+on getting openpgp2ssh to support passprotected keys.
-As another possibility, I was planning on modifying the script so that it could export to a passprotected file. I think this would be a lot more useful. Let me get that working, then let's revist the issue of including it in the packaging.
+As another possibility, I was planning on modifying the script so that
+it could export to a passprotected file. I think this would be a lot
+more useful. Let me get that working, then let's revist the issue of
+including it in the packaging.
--- Big Jimmy.
+-- Big Jimmy
---
-> Ok - sounds good to me. I'm thinking in terms of getting other people to try
-> out the Monkeysphere - maybe the README should just say: we're only half
-> done. You can verify the identity of servers, but we haven't completed the
-> part about verifying you to a server. Then it could say: if you're really
-> interested, you can run this hacky script but we make no guarantees.
+Ok - sounds good to me. I'm thinking in terms of getting other people to try
+out the Monkeysphere - maybe the README should just say: we're only half
+done. You can verify the identity of servers, but we haven't completed the
+part about verifying you to a server. Then it could say: if you're really
+interested, you can run this hacky script but we make no guarantees.
+
-- Sir Jam Jam