Supporting or switching to MultiMarkdown would take care of a few of the outstanding feature requests. Quoting from the MultiMarkdown site: >MultiMarkdown is a modification of John Gruber's original Markdown.pl file. It uses the same basic syntax, with several additions: > 1. I have added a basic metadata feature, to allow the inclusion of > metadata within a document that can be used in different ways based > on the output format. > 2. I have allowed the automatic use of cross-references within a Markdown > document. For instance, you can easily jump to > [the Introduction][Introduction]. > 3. I have incorporated John's proposed syntax for footnotes. Since he > has not determined the output format, I created my own. Mainly, I > wanted to be able to add footnotes to the LaTeX output; I was less > concerned with the XHTML formatting. > 4. Most importantly, however, I have changed the way that the processed > output is created, so that it is quite simple to export Markdown syntax > to a variety of outputs. By setting the `Format` metadata to `complete`, > you generate a well-formed XHTML page. You can then use XSLT to convert > to virtually any format you like. MultiMarkdown would solve the BibTex request and the multiple output formats would make the print_link request an easy fix. MultiMarkdown is actively developed and can be found at: [MultiMarkdown Homepage](http://fletcher.freeshell.org/wiki/MultiMarkdown) > I don't think MultiMarkdown solves [[the BibTeX request|todo/BibTeX]], but it might solve the request for LaTeX output. --[[JoshTriplett]]