From 507fd20d6ef3ce3ef3d82e9135093a97cfedfcd6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: joey Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 05:53:18 +0000 Subject: web commit by PatrickWinnertz --- doc/todo/latex.mdwn | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) (limited to 'doc/todo') diff --git a/doc/todo/latex.mdwn b/doc/todo/latex.mdwn index 04eacbad4..5367ffc5f 100644 --- a/doc/todo/latex.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/latex.mdwn @@ -169,6 +169,8 @@ Okay, the last version of the tex plugin for ikiwiki can be downloaded [here](ht > > Can you please flesh out [[plugins/tex]] with > whatever documentation people who know tex will expect to see? +Okay, I'll fill this up today I think with information about the plugin + > > Also, please review my changes. In particular, I changed the @badthings > array to use qr//, which is much clearer, but it needs to be tested that @@ -178,16 +180,26 @@ Okay, the last version of the tex plugin for ikiwiki can be downloaded [here](ht > Does it really make sense to have an alt tag for the image > that contains the tex code? Will that make any sense when browsing > without images? +Mh.. For people who know latex very well this would be enough to imagine how the image would look like. +This are of course the minority of people (but I guess also the minority of people are using non-gui browsers). + + > > I'm thinking about renameing the preprocessor directive to teximg. > \[[teximg code="" alt="foo"]] makes sense.. Would it make sense to rename > the whole plugin, or do you think that other tex stuff should go in this > same plugin? + +I'll think over this until I'm at work ;) + > > Note: I removed the style= attribute, since as I've told you, the > htmlsanitizer strips those since they can be used to insert javascript. I > put in a class=teximage instead; the style sheet could be modified to > style that, if you want to send a patch for that. +Ah yes.. sorry forgot to update the plugin in my public_html folder %-). This was my last change in this plugin :) Sorry. + + > > --[[Joey]] -- cgit v1.2.3