From 45dc852cd492eeedfb95cabcdaf2cab86bcb31af Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: joey Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 05:06:59 +0000 Subject: responses and more thoughts on the issue of discussion pages as blogs --- doc/todo/filtering_content_when_inlining.mdwn | 17 ++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'doc/todo/filtering_content_when_inlining.mdwn') diff --git a/doc/todo/filtering_content_when_inlining.mdwn b/doc/todo/filtering_content_when_inlining.mdwn index 028a42148..8a2326035 100644 --- a/doc/todo/filtering_content_when_inlining.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/filtering_content_when_inlining.mdwn @@ -1 +1,16 @@ -It would help to allow filtering of content when [[inlining|plugins/inline]] pages. For example, given some way to filter out the display of inlines within other inlines, a blog post could allow easy inline commenting by putting an inline directive with post form at the bottom of the post. \ No newline at end of file +It would help to allow filtering of content when +[[inlining|plugins/inline]] pages. For example, given some way to filter +out the display of inlines within other inlines, a blog post could allow +easy inline commenting by putting an inline directive with post form at the +bottom of the post. + +> That's trying to do the same thing as the todo item +> [[discussion_page_as_blog]]. Difference is that you're suggesting +> displaying the comments in the blog post that they comment on, instead +> of on the separate disucssion page. Which leads to the problem of those +> comments showing up inlined into the blog. +> +> I know there are benefits to having the comments on the same page and not +> a separate discussion page, but it does add compliciations and ikiwiki +> already has discussion pages, so I'm more likely to go the route +> described in [[discussion_page_as_blog]]. --[[Joey]] -- cgit v1.2.3