From 58474c3f37f9358b7f6f12d354ec40adbbb1bf3b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: joey Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 08:37:38 +0000 Subject: web commit by http://ethan.betacantrips.com/: document the issue --- doc/plugins/rst/discussion.mdwn | 15 +++++++++------ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) (limited to 'doc/plugins') diff --git a/doc/plugins/rst/discussion.mdwn b/doc/plugins/rst/discussion.mdwn index 68e8f514f..a792b670f 100644 --- a/doc/plugins/rst/discussion.mdwn +++ b/doc/plugins/rst/discussion.mdwn @@ -1,14 +1,17 @@ +The main problem with more sophisticated RST support is that ikiwiki turns +preprocessor directives into raw HTML and reST hates inline HTML. +inline relies on Markdown's handling of raw HTML, specifically +that it doesn't wrap paragraph-level `
`s in `

` tags -- see +[[todo/htmlvalidation]]. Other plugins might expect their output to be +interpreted in certain ways too -- [[Joey]] mentions toggleable and fortune. + Is [prest][1] the perl version of the reST processor referred to in the text? It seems to be reasonably well-maintained to me, and differences between it and -"standard" reST are pretty minor (a fairly exhaustive list, taken from the -prest docs, is at the end of this page). +"standard" reST are pretty minor. A fairly exhaustive list, taken from the +prest docs, follows: [1]: http://search.cpan.org/~nodine/Text-Restructured-0.003024/ -In addition, reST appears to allow raw HTML pass-through with the `raw` -directive, though I think a better solution would be expanding the format plugin -interface. --Ethan - An exhaustive list of differences between prest and "standard" reST follows: * fewer alternatives for bullet lists (only "+", "*" and "-") -- cgit v1.2.3