From 20df2ee6fe0b9cbde72f47193ede4ac7f971d617 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Giuseppe Bilotta Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 14:06:37 +0100 Subject: Some comments on fields namespacing --- doc/plugins/contrib/field/discussion.mdwn | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+) (limited to 'doc/plugins') diff --git a/doc/plugins/contrib/field/discussion.mdwn b/doc/plugins/contrib/field/discussion.mdwn index 191f8b27d..80d0b2b71 100644 --- a/doc/plugins/contrib/field/discussion.mdwn +++ b/doc/plugins/contrib/field/discussion.mdwn @@ -327,6 +327,51 @@ smcv's discuission of field author vs meta author above. --[[Joey]] ----- +I think the main point is: what is (or should be) the main point of the +field plugin? If it's essentially a way to present a consistent +interface to access page-related structured information, then it makes +sense to have it very general. Plugins registering with fields would +then present ways for recovering the structure information from the page +(`ymlfront`, `meta`, etc), ways to manipulate it (like `meta` does), +etc. + +In this sense, security should be entirely up to the plugins, although +the fields plugin could provide some auxiliary infrastructure (like +determining where the data comes from and raise or lower the security +level accoringly). + +Namespacing is important, and it should be considered at the field +plugin interface level. A plugin should be able to register as +responsible for the processing of all data belonging to a given +namespace, but plugins should be able to set data in any namespace. So +for example, `meta` register are `meta` fields processing, and whatever +method is used to set the data (`meta` directive, `ymlfront`, etc) it +gets a say on what to do with data in its namespace. + +What I'm thinking of is something you could call fieldsets. The nice +thing about them is that, aside from the ones defined by plugins (like +`meta`), it would be possible to define custom ones (with a generic, +default processor) in an appropriate file (like smileys and shortcuts) +with a syntax like: + + [[!fieldset book namespace=book + fields="author title isbn" + fieldtype="text text text"]] + +after which, you coude use + + [[!book author="A. U. Thor" + title="Fields of Iki"]] + +and the data would be available under the book namespace, and thus +as BOOK_AUTHOR, BOOK_TITLE etc in templates. + +Security, in this sense, would be up to the plugin responsible for the +namespace processing (the default handler would HTML-escape text fields +scrub, html fields, safeurl()ify url fields, etc.) + +----- + I was just looking at HTML5 and wondered if the field plugin should generate the new Microdata tags (as well as the internal structures)? -- [[Will]] > This could just as easily be done as a separate plugin. Feel free to do so. --[[KathrynAndersen]] -- cgit v1.2.3