From 63bc057690d388a81e643d4556c6a001d886b59c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://smcv.pseudorandom.co.uk/" Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2010 01:35:35 +0000 Subject: --- doc/plugins/contrib/report/discussion.mdwn | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) (limited to 'doc/plugins/contrib') diff --git a/doc/plugins/contrib/report/discussion.mdwn b/doc/plugins/contrib/report/discussion.mdwn index 953509297..a257198c0 100644 --- a/doc/plugins/contrib/report/discussion.mdwn +++ b/doc/plugins/contrib/report/discussion.mdwn @@ -60,3 +60,10 @@ to select pages? How does it relate to [[todo/wikitrails]] or >>> Either that, or somehow combine tagging with fields, such that one could declare a tag, and it would create both a link and a field with a given value. (I've been working on something like that, but it still has bugs). >>> That way, the test for whether something is tagged would be something like "link(tag/foo) and field(tag foo)". >>> --K.A. + +>>>> I can see that this'd work well for 1:1 relationships like next +>>>> and previous, but I don't think that'd work for pages with more than +>>>> one tag - as far as I can see, `field`'s data model is that each +>>>> page has no more than one value for each field? +>>>> [[todo/Matching_different_kinds_of_links]] has some thoughts about +>>>> how it could be implemented, though. --s -- cgit v1.2.3