From fdd994fb7365308bde162b72b280512f2db6a339 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joey Hess Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:15:52 -0500 Subject: more comments doc updates Moved todo items to a todo page, mark the old todo item about comments as done, etc. --- doc/plugins/comments/discussion.mdwn | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) (limited to 'doc/plugins/comments') diff --git a/doc/plugins/comments/discussion.mdwn b/doc/plugins/comments/discussion.mdwn index 59740ec37..2a87a3d93 100644 --- a/doc/plugins/comments/discussion.mdwn +++ b/doc/plugins/comments/discussion.mdwn @@ -63,6 +63,9 @@ spam problems. So, use `check_canedit` as at least a first-level check? > This is why `anonok_pages => 'postcomment(*)'` and `locked_pages => '!postcomment(*)'` > are necessary to allow anonymous and logged-in editing (respectively). > +>> I changed that to move the flag out of the page name, and into a variable that the `match_postcomment` +>> function checks for. Other ugliness still applies. :-) --[[Joey]] +> > This is ugly - one alternative would be to add `check_permission()` that takes a > page and a verb (create, edit, rename, remove and maybe comment are the ones I > can think of so far), use that, and port the plugins you mentioned to use that -- cgit v1.2.3