From c2cf78dd4b70e9fa379ae0eee9034fa35db1b521 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://www.lunix.com.au/" Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 21:18:36 -0400 Subject: add my response --- doc/forum/is_it_possible_to_NOT_add_openid2_meta_tags.mdwn | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) (limited to 'doc/forum') diff --git a/doc/forum/is_it_possible_to_NOT_add_openid2_meta_tags.mdwn b/doc/forum/is_it_possible_to_NOT_add_openid2_meta_tags.mdwn index 1a6d01cd3..766eae450 100644 --- a/doc/forum/is_it_possible_to_NOT_add_openid2_meta_tags.mdwn +++ b/doc/forum/is_it_possible_to_NOT_add_openid2_meta_tags.mdwn @@ -47,3 +47,7 @@ lays with the consumers not falling back to the openid1 tags when they are openi > consumers seem justified in not falling back (guess; I don't know the 2.0 spec). > The only way this seems fixable is to add an option to meta to allow disabling openid 2. Which > should be easy enough to do. --[[Joey]] + +I can't log into identi.ca with openid2 tags. strange. I will look at that again today. +Having the option to disable openid2 tags would be perfect. +Thanks Joey. --[Mick](http://www.lunix.com.au) -- cgit v1.2.3