From f0f28c38968434f4aa9855e163bb500c36ad5189 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: joey <joey@0fa5a96a-9a0e-0410-b3b2-a0fd24251071>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 08:33:28 +0000
Subject: web commit by http://willu.myopenid.com/: Respond with details of
monotone plugin (and small bug fix)
---
doc/bugs/Monotone_rcs_support.mdwn | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
(limited to 'doc/bugs')
diff --git a/doc/bugs/Monotone_rcs_support.mdwn b/doc/bugs/Monotone_rcs_support.mdwn
index 11f93f11b..fad95d155 100644
--- a/doc/bugs/Monotone_rcs_support.mdwn
+++ b/doc/bugs/Monotone_rcs_support.mdwn
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ Note: This patch requires a rather recent Monotone perl module (18 August 2007 o
>>> Fair enough. Didn't realize you were a monotone committer. :-)
->>>> I am, but still a little newish. Feedback is good.
+>>>> I am, but still a little newish. Feedback is good. In particular, this is my first major bit of PERL.
> Having rcs_commit return a warning message when there's an unresolved conflict
> isn't right; that message will populate the page edit box. You might want
@@ -33,11 +33,62 @@ Note: This patch requires a rather recent Monotone perl module (18 August 2007 o
[[tag patch]]
>> I've [[accepted|done]] this patch, thank you!
->>
+
+>>> Thanks for committing it. I hate keeping my own diffs. :)
+
>> I did make a few changes. Please review, and make sure it still works
>> (a test case like we have for some of the other RCSes would be nice..)
->>
+
+>>> Tested. It still works at least as well as it did. I'll try to get to a test case soon.
+>>> In checking the source I noticed a few bogus comments I left in when editing,
+>>> and a bug in page adding.
+>>> Here is a small patch for them:
+
+ Index: IkiWiki/Rcs/monotone.pm
+ ===================================================================
+ --- IkiWiki/Rcs/monotone.pm (revision 4195)
+ +++ IkiWiki/Rcs/monotone.pm (working copy)
+ @@ -245,6 +245,9 @@
+ # FIXME: use of $file in these backticks is not wise from a
+ # security POV. Probably safe, but should be avoided
+ # anyway.
+ + # At the moment the backticks are used because the above call using the automate
+ + # interface was failing. When that bug in monotone is fixed, we should switch
+ + # back.
+ my $diff = `mtn --root=$config{mtnrootdir} au content_diff -r $oldrev -r $rev $file`; # was just $out;
+
+ if ($diff) {
+ @@ -314,8 +317,6 @@
+ "Please use the non-web interface to resolve the conflicts.");
+ }
+
+ - # suspend this revision because it has
+ - # conflict markers...
+ if (system("mtn", "--root=$config{mtnrootdir}",
+ "update", "-r", $mergeResult) != 0) {
+ debug("Unable to update to rev $mergeResult after conflict-enhanced merge on conflicted commit!");
+ @@ -363,7 +364,7 @@
+ check_config();
+
+ if (system("mtn", "--root=$config{mtnrootdir}", "add", "--quiet",
+ - "$config{srcdir}/$file") != 0) {
+ + $file) != 0) {
+ error("Monotone add failed");
+ }
+ } #}}}
+
>> BTW, will all the monotone output parsing work if LANG != C?
->>
+
+>>> It should (he says crossing fingers).
+>>> In the places where I do any complex parsing I'm using a special
+>>> version of the mtn commands designed for scripting. They have a
+>>> stable, easy to parse, output that doesn't get translated (I think).
+
>> Do monotone post-commit hooks actually use REV?
+
+>>> Monotone post-commit hooks are written in Lua and can do
+>>> what they please. Setting the REV environment var before
+>>> calling Ikiwiki seems reasonable, but I've not written the
+>>> Lua hook.
+
>> --[[Joey]]
--
cgit v1.2.3