From a0b53cf26b3d72d06cfa6b20de764ad2d0ae7f06 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~willu/" Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 21:44:46 -0400 Subject: Comments and links --- doc/todo/Better_bug_tracking_support.mdwn | 13 ++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/todo/Better_bug_tracking_support.mdwn b/doc/todo/Better_bug_tracking_support.mdwn index 628a67fc8..1a810ad55 100644 --- a/doc/todo/Better_bug_tracking_support.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/Better_bug_tracking_support.mdwn @@ -44,7 +44,18 @@ be embedded to the source code repository commit messages. >> look like a wikipage anymore, but rather something like the Debian >> BTS web-interface, but it would still benefit from wikilinks to the >> documentation in the wiki etc. ->> + +>>> I think it is useful to look at these things separately: +>>> +>>> * Bug numbers: See above. +>>> * Automatic timestamps on comments: this already exists with the inline directive. +>>> * Email interface: You can certainly get an rss feed of what changes in the wiki. +>>> * You didn't mention [[todo/structured_page_data]] but that is, I think, part +>>> of what you seem to be saying. +>>> * [[todo/tracking_bugs_with_dependencies]] is also important. +>>> +>>> -- [[Will]] + >> About the commit message interface: I was thinking about a project >> architecture where the code is kept in a separate revision control >> system branch than the metadata (blog, wiki, BTS). This would IMHO -- cgit v1.2.3