diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'doc')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/bugs/inline_sort_order_and_meta_date_value.mdwn | 213 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | doc/todo/comments.mdwn | 127 |
2 files changed, 289 insertions, 51 deletions
diff --git a/doc/bugs/inline_sort_order_and_meta_date_value.mdwn b/doc/bugs/inline_sort_order_and_meta_date_value.mdwn index d851ef397..d4ec8f345 100644 --- a/doc/bugs/inline_sort_order_and_meta_date_value.mdwn +++ b/doc/bugs/inline_sort_order_and_meta_date_value.mdwn @@ -99,3 +99,216 @@ first, explains everything you describe. If not, please send me a shell script test case I can run, as instructions like "Create pages that sort different by mtime and ctime" are not ones that I know how to follow (given that touch sets *both*). --[[Joey]] + +> Sorry. I conflated Unix ctime and ikiwiki's creation time because I +> didn't think the difference was important to this case. I'm a writer, +> and I should have known better -- I appologize. Revised steps to +> reproduce are below; feel free to delete this whole misunderstanding +> to make the bug report more concise. +> +> 1. Create pages in the srcdir that should sort in one order by +> last-modification time and in a diffent order by original creation +> time. For example: +> +> $ echo -e '\[[!meta date="2007-01-01"]]\nNew.' > test/new.mdwn +> $ echo -e '\[[!meta date="2006-01-01"]]\nOld.' > test/old.mdwn +> +> 2. Create a page that includes the files. For example: +> +> +> $ echo '\[[!inline pages="test/*"]]' > sort-test.mdwn +> +> 3. Run ikiwiki. For example `ikiwiki --setup setup_file` +> +> 4. Pages are output incorrectly in modification time order. For example, +> actual partial HTML of the sort-test/index.html from commands used +> above (whitespace-only lines removed; one whitespace-only line +> added): +> +> <div class="inlinepage"> +> <span class="header"> +> <a href="./../test/old/">old</a> +> </span> +> <p>Old.</p> +> <span class="pagedate"> +> Posted Sun 01 Jan 2006 12:00:00 AM EST +> </span> +> </div> +> +> <div class="inlinepage"> +> <span class="header"> +> <a href="./../test/new/">new</a> +> </span> +> <p>New.</p> +> <span class="pagedate"> +> Posted Mon 01 Jan 2007 12:00:00 AM EST +> </span> +> </div> +> +> 5. Run ikiwiki again with the same command line. For example: `ikiwiki --setup setup_file` +> +> 6. Pages are output correctly in creation time order. For example, +> actual partial HTML of the sort-test/index.html from commands used +> above (whitespace-only lines removed; one whitespace-only line +> added): +> +> <div class="inlinepage"> +> <span class="header"> +> <a href="./../test/new/">new</a> +> </span> +> <p>New.</p> +> <span class="pagedate"> +> Posted Mon 01 Jan 2007 12:00:00 AM EST +> </span> +> </div> +> +> <div class="inlinepage"> +> <span class="header"> +> <a href="./../test/old/">old</a> +> </span> +> <p>Old.</p> +> <span class="pagedate"> +> Posted Sun 01 Jan 2006 12:00:00 AM EST +> </span> +> </div> +> +> 7. Create a new page with the current Unix mtime and Unix ctime, but a +> !meta date before the most recent creation date of another page. +> For example: +> +> $ echo -e '\[[!meta date="2005-01-01"]]\nOlder.' > test/older.mdwn +> +> 8. Run ikiwiki again with the same command line. For example: `ikiwiki --setup setup_file` +> +> 9. All previously sorted pages output correctly in order of their +> creation time, but the new page is output incorrectly at the top as +> if its modification time was its creation time. For example, +> actual partial HTML of the sort-test/index.html from commands used +> above (whitespace-only lines removed; two whitespace-only +> lines added): +> +> <div class="inlinepage"> +> <span class="header"> +> <a href="./../test/older/">older</a> +> </span> +> <p>Older.</p> +> <span class="pagedate"> +> Posted Sat 01 Jan 2005 12:00:00 AM EST +> </span> +> </div> +> +> <div class="inlinepage"> +> <span class="header"> +> <a href="./../test/new/">new</a> +> </span> +> <p>New.</p> +> <span class="pagedate"> +> Posted Mon 01 Jan 2007 12:00:00 AM EST +> </span> +> </div> +> +> <div class="inlinepage"> +> <span class="header"> +> <a href="./../test/old/">old</a> +> </span> +> <p>Old.</p> +> <span class="pagedate"> +> Posted Sun 01 Jan 2006 12:00:00 AM EST +> </span> +> </div> +> +> 10. Run ikiwiki again with the same command line. For example: `ikiwiki --setup setup_file` +> +> 11. All pages, including new page, are output correctly in creation time +> order. For example, actual partial HTML of the sort-test/index.html +> from commands used above (whitespace-only lines removed; two +> whitespace-only lines added): +> +> <div class="inlinepage"> +> <span class="header"> +> <a href="./../test/new/">new</a> +> </span> +> <p>New.</p> +> <span class="pagedate"> +> Posted Mon 01 Jan 2007 12:00:00 AM EST +> </span> +> </div> +> +> <div class="inlinepage"> +> <span class="header"> +> <a href="./../test/old/">old</a> +> </span> +> <p>Old.</p> +> <span class="pagedate"> +> Posted Sun 01 Jan 2006 12:00:00 AM EST +> </span> +> </div> +> +> <div class="inlinepage"> +> <span class="header"> +> <a href="./../test/older/">older</a> +> </span> +> <p>Older.</p> +> <span class="pagedate"> +> Posted Sat 01 Jan 2005 12:00:00 AM EST +> </span> +> </div> +> +> File status after all the above actions: +> +> $ stat test/* +> File: `test/new.mdwn' +> Size: 33 Blocks: 8 IO Block: 4096 regular file +> Device: ca20h/51744d Inode: 684160 Links: 1 +> Access: (0644/-rw-r--r--) Uid: ( 1000/ harding) Gid: ( 1000/ harding) +> Access: 2008-12-20 21:48:32.000000000 -0500 +> Modify: 2008-12-20 21:27:03.000000000 -0500 +> Change: 2008-12-20 21:27:03.000000000 -0500 +> File: `test/older.mdwn' +> Size: 35 Blocks: 8 IO Block: 4096 regular file +> Device: ca20h/51744d Inode: 684407 Links: 1 +> Access: (0644/-rw-r--r--) Uid: ( 1000/ harding) Gid: ( 1000/ harding) +> Access: 2008-12-20 21:48:32.000000000 -0500 +> Modify: 2008-12-20 21:42:10.000000000 -0500 +> Change: 2008-12-20 21:42:10.000000000 -0500 +> File: `test/old.mdwn' +> Size: 33 Blocks: 8 IO Block: 4096 regular file +> Device: ca20h/51744d Inode: 684161 Links: 1 +> Access: (0644/-rw-r--r--) Uid: ( 1000/ harding) Gid: ( 1000/ harding) +> Access: 2008-12-20 21:48:32.000000000 -0500 +> Modify: 2008-12-20 21:27:09.000000000 -0500 +> Change: 2008-12-20 21:27:09.000000000 -0500 +> +> My ikiwiki configuration file (being used to port a blog from pyblosxom +> to ikiwiki): +> +> harding@mail:~$ sed 's/#.*//; /^[ ]*$/d' .ikiwiki/gnuisance.setup +> use IkiWiki::Setup::Standard { +> wikiname => "HardingBlog", +> adminemail => 'dave@dtrt.org', +> srcdir => "/srv/backup/git/gnuisance.net", +> destdir => "/srv/test.dtrt.org", +> url => "http://srv.dtrt.org", +> wrappers => [ +> ], +> atom => 1, +> syslog => 0, +> prefix_directives => 1, +> add_plugins => [qw{goodstuff tag}], +> disable_plugins => [qw{passwordauth}], +> tagbase => "tag", +> } +> +> --[David A. Harding](http://dtrt.org/), 2008-12-20 + +Thank you for a textbook excellent reproduction recipe. + +What appears to be going on here is that meta directives are not processed +until the leaf pages are rendered, and thus the ctime setting is not +available at the time that they are inlined, and the newer unix ctime is +used. On the second build, the meta data has already been recorded. + +This can probably be avoided by processing meta date at scan time. + +Verified, fix works. [[done]] +--[[Joey]] diff --git a/doc/todo/comments.mdwn b/doc/todo/comments.mdwn index 12aef0bb3..4edc3c3a1 100644 --- a/doc/todo/comments.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/comments.mdwn @@ -1,22 +1,29 @@ -Known issues with the [[plugins/comments]] plugin: +# Known issues with the [[plugins/comments]] plugin -* There is some common code cargo-culted from other plugins (notably inline and editpage) which - should probably be shared - - > Actually, there's less of this now than there used to be - a lot of simple - > things that were shared have become unshareable as they became more - > complex. --[[smcv]] +## Unimplemented * Previews always say "unknown IP address" -* Add `COMMENTOPENID`: the authenticated/verified user name, if and only if it was an OpenID +* Instead of just a link to add a comment, it could have a form to enter + the title, similar to the form for adding a new blog post. - > Done in my comments git branch --[[smcv]] + > I'm not sure this is so useful? On Livejournal titles are allowed on + > comments, but very rarely used (and indeed usually not very useful); + > it's hard enough to get some people to title their blog posts :-) + > --[[smcv]] - > Not seeing it there, which branch? --[[Joey]] +* If a spammer posts a comment, it is either impossible or hard to clean + up via the web. Would be nice to have some kind of link on the comment + that allows trusted users to remove it (using the remove plugin of + course). - >> Bah, git push --all is not the default... 'comments' branch now (I've also rebased it). - >> Sorry, I'm on mobile Internet at the moment... --[[smcv]] + > Won't the remove plugin refuse to remove internal pages? This would be + > a good feature to have, though. --[[smcv]] + +* Now that inline has some comments-specific functionality anyway, it would + be good to output `<link rel="comments">` in Atom and the equivalent in RSS. + +## Patches pending merge * The default template should have a (?) icon next to unauthenticated users (with the IP address as title) and an OpenID icon next to OpenIDs @@ -29,49 +36,38 @@ Known issues with the [[plugins/comments]] plugin: >> directory (untested!) --[[smcv]] >>> The new code produces links like /wikiisons/openid.png, which - >>> fail if ikiwiki is not at the root of the web server. --[[Joey]] + >>> fail if ikiwiki is not at the root of the web server. --[[Joey]] + + >>>> Sorry, I should have spotted that (the assumption failed on my demo + >>>> site, but the push to that site was when I was on the way out, so I + >>>> didn't have time to investigate). As a note for other ikiwiki hackers, + >>>> I should have used + >>>> `<img src="<TMPL_VAR NAME=BASEURL>wikiicons/openid.png" />`. --[[smcv]] >>> I got to wondering if the icons are needed. On my comments branch >>> (not master), I've dropped the icons and info can be seen by hovering >>> over the author's name. Idea being that you probably don't care how >>> they authenticated unless something is weird, and in that case you >>> can hover to check. Does that make sense, should I merge it? - >>> --[[Joey]] - -* Should the comments be visually set off more from the page above? - Rather than just a horizontal rule, I'm thinking put the comments - in a box like is used for inlined pages. - - > I did put them in a box in the CSS... I agree the default template - > could do with visual improvement though. --[[smcv]] + >>> --[[Joey]] -* Instead of just a link to add a comment, it could have a form to enter - the title, similar to the form for adding a new blog post. - - > I'm not sure this is so useful? On Livejournal titles are allowed on - > comments, but very rarely used (and indeed usually not very useful); - > it's hard enough to get some people to title their blog posts :-) - > --[[smcv]] - -* If a spammer posts a comment, it is either impossible or hard to clean - up via the web. Would be nice to have some kind of link on the comment - that allows trusted users to remove it (using the remove plugin of - course). + >>>> Yeah, go ahead. I preferred my layout with the author before the + >>>> comment - perhaps that's Livejournal's influence :-) - but I can always + >>>> edit the templates for my own site. As long as the default is something + >>>> reasonable and both layouts are possible, I don't really mind. + >>>> Minimizing the number of "resource" files in the basewiki also seems + >>>> a good goal. --[[smcv]] - > Won't the remove plugin refuse to remove internal pages? This would be - > a good feature to have, though. --[[smcv]] +## Won't fix -* One can use inline to set up a feed of all comments posted to any page. - Using template=comment they are displayed right. Only problem - is there is no indication in that template of what page each comment in the - feed is a comment on. So, if a comment is inlined into a different page, - I think it should show a link back to the page commented on. - (BTW, the rss feed in this situation seems ok; there the link element - points back to the parent page. +* There is some common code cargo-culted from other plugins (notably inline and editpage) which + should probably be shared - > done --[[Joey]] + > Actually, there's less of this now than there used to be - a lot of simple + > things that were shared have become unshareable as they became more + > complex. --[[smcv]] -* It would be useful to have a pagespec that always matches all comments on +* It would be useful to have a pagespec that always matches all comments on pages matching a glob. Something like `comment(blog/*)`. Perhaps postcomment could also be folded into this? Then the pagespec would match both existing comments, as well as new comments that are @@ -89,17 +85,46 @@ Known issues with the [[plugins/comments]] plugin: > would also let X edit/delete comments on blog pages (including those > written by others) in arbitrary ways, which doesn't seem good. --[[smcv]] - > I had a look at implementing comment() and fell afoul of + > I had a look at implementing comment() and fell afoul of > some optimisations that assume only internal() will be used to match - > internal pages. So probably this isn't worth doing. --[[Joey]] + > internal pages. So probably this isn't worth doing. --[[Joey]] + +## Done + +* Add `COMMENTOPENID`: the authenticated/verified user name, if and only if it was an OpenID + + > Done in my comments git branch --[[smcv]] + + > Not seeing it there, which branch? --[[Joey]] + + >> Bah, git push --all is not the default... 'comments' branch now (I've also rebased it). + >> Sorry, I'm on mobile Internet at the moment... --[[smcv]] + + >>> merged by [[Joey]] in commit 0f03af38 --[[smcv]] + +* Should the comments be visually set off more from the page above? + Rather than just a horizontal rule, I'm thinking put the comments + in a box like is used for inlined pages. + + > I did put them in a box in the CSS... I agree the default template + > could do with visual improvement though. --[[smcv]] + + >> I'll consider this solved by [[Joey]]'s changes. --[[smcv]] + +* One can use inline to set up a feed of all comments posted to any page. + Using template=comment they are displayed right. Only problem + is there is no indication in that template of what page each comment in the + feed is a comment on. So, if a comment is inlined into a different page, + I think it should show a link back to the page commented on. + (BTW, the rss feed in this situation seems ok; there the link element + points back to the parent page. + + > done --[[Joey]] * One of Joey's commit messages says "Not ideal, it would be nicer to jump to the actual comment posted, but no anchor is available". In fact there is - an anchor - the `\[[_comment]]` preprocessing wraps the comment in a <div> + an anchor - the `\[[_comment]]` preprocessing wraps the comment in a `<div>` with id="comment_123" or something. I'll fix this, unless Joey gets there first. --[[smcv]] - > done --[[Joey]] - -* Now that inline has some comments-specific functionality anyway, it would - be good to output '<link rel="comments">' in Atom and the equivalent in RSS. + > done --[[Joey]] |