summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc')
-rw-r--r--doc/todo/syntax_highlighting.mdwn20
1 files changed, 20 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/todo/syntax_highlighting.mdwn b/doc/todo/syntax_highlighting.mdwn
index bb1c84f02..645dd56bc 100644
--- a/doc/todo/syntax_highlighting.mdwn
+++ b/doc/todo/syntax_highlighting.mdwn
@@ -32,6 +32,10 @@ pages, as well as doing syntax highlighting as a preprocessor directive
we could use an external plugin..)
* Currently no single plugin supports both modes of operation (directive
and whole source file to page).
+
+ > This is now fixed by the [[ikiwiki/directive/format]] directive for all
+ > whole-source-file plugins, right?
+
* Nothing seems to support
[[wiki-formatted_comments|wiki-formatted_comments_with_syntax_plugin]]
inside source files. Doing this probably means post-processing the
@@ -45,6 +49,17 @@ pages, as well as doing syntax highlighting as a preprocessor directive
One approach that's also been requested for eg,
[[plugins/contrib/mediawiki]] is to allow controlling which linkification
types a page type can have on it.
+
+ > The previous two points seem to be related. One thought: instead of
+ > getting the source from the `content` parameter, the plugin could
+ > re-load the page source. That would stop directives/links from
+ > being processed in the source. As noted above, comments
+ > could then be parsed for directives/links later.
+ >
+ > Would it be worth adding a `nodirectives` option when registering
+ > an htmlize hook that switches off directive and link processing before
+ > generating the html for a page?
+
* The whole-file plugins all get confused if there is a `foo.c` and a `foo.h`.
This is trivially fixable now by passing the keepextension option when
registering the htmlize hooks, though.
@@ -61,6 +76,11 @@ pages, as well as doing syntax highlighting as a preprocessor directive
extensions. The workaround is to use a directive on a wiki page, pulling
in the Makefile.
+ > I wonder how hard it would be to make a patch where by a file with
+ > no `.` in the name, and a name that matches a filetype, and where
+ > that filetype was registered `keepextension`, then the file is just
+ > chosen as the appropriate type...
+
## format directive
Rather than making syntax highlight plugins have to provide a preprocessor