summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc')
-rw-r--r--doc/todo/Allow_web_edit_form_comment_field_to_be_mandatory.mdwn4
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/doc/todo/Allow_web_edit_form_comment_field_to_be_mandatory.mdwn b/doc/todo/Allow_web_edit_form_comment_field_to_be_mandatory.mdwn
index 132fecaa5..2439cd65f 100644
--- a/doc/todo/Allow_web_edit_form_comment_field_to_be_mandatory.mdwn
+++ b/doc/todo/Allow_web_edit_form_comment_field_to_be_mandatory.mdwn
@@ -17,4 +17,6 @@ In our team internal wiki, we wish to impose a policy that all edits must have a
> a plugin, without providing a whole new template for editform, which obviously
> isn't a workable solution. If the template was modified to allow overriding the
> portion of the message in question, then I agree that a plugin couuld do the rest.
-> Thoughts appreciated :) --[[Dom]] \ No newline at end of file
+> Thoughts appreciated :) --[[Dom]]
+
+> Yes, modifying the template is ok. --[[Joey]]