diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/todo')
5 files changed, 74 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/doc/todo/Add_nicer_math_formatting.mdwn b/doc/todo/Add_nicer_math_formatting.mdwn index 041eaee11..6e082c102 100644 --- a/doc/todo/Add_nicer_math_formatting.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/Add_nicer_math_formatting.mdwn @@ -1,5 +1,24 @@ -It would be nice to add nicer math formatting. I currently use the [[plugins/teximg]] plugin, but I wonder if [jsMath](http://www.math.union.edu/~dpvc/jsMath/) wouldn't be a better option. +It would be nice to add nicer math formatting. I currently use the +[[plugins/teximg]] plugin, but I wonder if +[jsMath](http://www.math.union.edu/~dpvc/jsMath/) wouldn't be a better option. [[Will]] +> I've looked at jsmath (which is nicely packaged in Debian), and +> I agree that this is nicer than TeX images. That text-mode browsers +> get to see LaTeX as a fallback is actually a nice feature (better +> than nothing, right? :) That browsers w/o javascript will not be able to +> see the math either is probably ok. +> +> A plugin would probably be a pretty trivial thing to write. +> It just needs to include the javascript files, +> and slap a `<div class="math"> avound the user's code`, then +> call `jsMath.Process(document);` at the end of the page. +> +> My only concern is security: Has jsMath's parser been written +> to be safe when processing untrusted input? Could a user abuse the +> parser to cause it to emit/run arbitrary javascript code? +> I've posted a question about this to its forum: --[[Joey]] +> <https://sourceforge.net/projects/jsmath/forums/forum/592273/topic/3831574> + [[!tag wishlist]] diff --git a/doc/todo/edit_form:_no_fixed_size_for_textarea.mdwn b/doc/todo/edit_form:_no_fixed_size_for_textarea.mdwn index 577c3dad8..77e46049f 100644 --- a/doc/todo/edit_form:_no_fixed_size_for_textarea.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/edit_form:_no_fixed_size_for_textarea.mdwn @@ -40,3 +40,13 @@ browsers emulate it. [[done]] --[[Joey]] Wouldn't it be possible to just implement an integer-valued setting for this, accessible via the "Setup" wiki page? This would require a wiki regen, but such a setting would not be changed frequently I suppose. Also, Mediawiki has this implemented as a per-user setting (two settings, actually, -- number of rows and columns of the edit area); such a per-user setting would be the best possible implementation, but I'm not sure if ikiwiki already supports per-user settings. Please consider implementing this as the current 20 rows is a great PITA for any non-trivial page. + +> I don't think it would need a wiki rebuild, as the textarea is generated dynamically by the CGI when you perform a CGI action, and (as far as I know) is not cooked into any static content. -- [[Jon]] + +>> There is no need for a configuration setting for this -- to change +>> the default height from 20 rows to something else, you can just put +>> something like this in your `local.css`: --[[Joey]] + + #editcontent { + height: 50em; + } diff --git a/doc/todo/po:_remove_po_files_when_disabling_plugin.mdwn b/doc/todo/po:_remove_po_files_when_disabling_plugin.mdwn index 0801f7fcd..5d0318ae1 100644 --- a/doc/todo/po:_remove_po_files_when_disabling_plugin.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/po:_remove_po_files_when_disabling_plugin.mdwn @@ -9,3 +9,5 @@ files from the source repository when it has been disabled? >> in most cases, it is not, thanks to .gitignore or similar, but we >> can't be sure. So I just can't decide it is needed to call >> `rcs_remove` rather than a good old `unlink`. --[[intrigeri]] + +>>> I guess you could call `rcs_remove` followed by `unlink`. --[[Joey]] diff --git a/doc/todo/support_link__40__.__41___in_pagespec.mdwn b/doc/todo/support_link__40__.__41___in_pagespec.mdwn index 79809662a..653db1ff2 100644 --- a/doc/todo/support_link__40__.__41___in_pagespec.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/support_link__40__.__41___in_pagespec.mdwn @@ -11,3 +11,11 @@ IkiWiki.pm is the best way to do it". > I implemented this suggestion in the simplest possible way, [[!taglink patch]] available [[here|http://git.oblomov.eu/ikiwiki/patch/f4a52de556436fdee00fd92ca9a3b46e876450fa]]. > An alternative approach, very similar, would be to make the empty page parameter mean current page (e.g. `link()` would mean pages linking here). The patch would be very similar. > -- GB + +>> Thanks for this, and also for your recent spam-fighting. +>> Huh, I was right about changing derel, didn't realize it would be +>> so obvious a change. :) Oh well, I managed to complicate it +>> some in optimisation pass.. ;) +>> +>> Note that your git-daemon on git.oblomov.eu seems down. +>> I pulled the patch from gitweb, [[done]] --[[Joey]] diff --git a/doc/todo/want_to_avoid_ikiwiki_using_http_or_https_in_urls_to_allow_serving_both.mdwn b/doc/todo/want_to_avoid_ikiwiki_using_http_or_https_in_urls_to_allow_serving_both.mdwn index 5f17e3ae0..63fd3d11d 100644 --- a/doc/todo/want_to_avoid_ikiwiki_using_http_or_https_in_urls_to_allow_serving_both.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/want_to_avoid_ikiwiki_using_http_or_https_in_urls_to_allow_serving_both.mdwn @@ -12,20 +12,47 @@ It would be good if relative paths could be used instead, so the transport metho > "../../", and "../". The only absolute links are to CGIs and the w3c DTD. > --[[Joey]] ->> The problem is within the CGI script. The links within the HTML page are all absolute, including links to the css file. ->> Having a http links within a HTML page retrieved using https upset most browsers (I think). Also if I push cancel on the edit page in https, I end up at at http page. -- Brian May +>> The problem is within the CGI script. The links within the HTML page are all +>> absolute, including links to the css file. Having a http links within a HTML +>> page retrieved using https upset most browsers (I think). Also if I push cancel +>> on the edit page in https, I end up at at http page. -- Brian May >>> Ikiwiki does not hardcode http links anywhere. If you don't want >>> it to use such links, change your configuration to use https >>> consistently. --[[Joey]] -Errr... That is not a solution, that is a work around. ikiwiki does not hard code the absolute paths, but absolute paths are hard coded in the configuration file. If you want to serve your website so that the majority of users can see it as http, including in rss feeds (this allows proxy caches to cache the contents and has reduced load requirements), but editing is done via https for increased security, it is not possible. I have some ideas how this can be implemented (as ikiwiki has the absolute path to the CGI script and the absolute path to the destination, it should be possible to generate a relative path from one to the other), although some minor issues still need to be resolved. -- Brian May - -I noticed the links to the images on <http://ikiwiki.info/recentchanges/> are also absolute, that is <http://ikiwiki.info/wikiicons/diff.png>; this seems surprising, as the change.tmpl file uses <TMPL_VAR BASEURL> -which seems to do the right thing in page.tmpl, but not for change.tmpl. Where is BASEURL set? -- Brian May +Errr... That is not a solution, that is a work around. ikiwiki does not hard +code the absolute paths, but absolute paths are hard coded in the configuration +file. If you want to serve your website so that the majority of users can see +it as http, including in rss feeds (this allows proxy caches to cache the +contents and has reduced load requirements), but editing is done via https for +increased security, it is not possible. I have some ideas how this can be +implemented (as ikiwiki has the absolute path to the CGI script and the +absolute path to the destination, it should be possible to generate a relative +path from one to the other), although some minor issues still need to be +resolved. -- Brian May + +I noticed the links to the images on <http://ikiwiki.info/recentchanges/> are +also absolute, that is <http://ikiwiki.info/wikiicons/diff.png>; this seems +surprising, as the change.tmpl file uses <TMPL_VAR BASEURL> which seems +to do the right thing in page.tmpl, but not for change.tmpl. Where is BASEURL +set? -- Brian May > The use of an absolute baseurl in change.tmpl is a special case. --[[Joey]] -So I'm facing this same issue. I have a wiki which needs to be accessed on three different URLs(!) and the hard coding of the URL from the setup file is becoming a problem for me. Is there anything I can do here? --[[Perry]] +So I'm facing this same issue. I have a wiki which needs to be accessed on +three different URLs(!) and the hard coding of the URL from the setup file is +becoming a problem for me. Is there anything I can do here? --[[Perry]] + +> I remain puzzled by the problem that Brian is discussing. I don't see +> why you can't just set the cgiurl and url to a https url, and serve +> the site using both http and https. +> +> Just for example, <https://kitenet.net/> is an ikiwiki, and it is accessible +> via https or http, and if you use https, links will remain on https (except +> for links using the cgi, which I could fix by changing the cgiurl to https). +> +> I think it's possible ikiwiki used to have some +> absolute urls that have been fixed since Brian filed the bug. --[[Joey]] [[wishlist]] |