diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/todo/Resolve_native_reStructuredText_links_to_ikiwiki_pages.mdwn')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/todo/Resolve_native_reStructuredText_links_to_ikiwiki_pages.mdwn | 17 |
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/doc/todo/Resolve_native_reStructuredText_links_to_ikiwiki_pages.mdwn b/doc/todo/Resolve_native_reStructuredText_links_to_ikiwiki_pages.mdwn index 4468ce1e9..0f8e63aae 100644 --- a/doc/todo/Resolve_native_reStructuredText_links_to_ikiwiki_pages.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/Resolve_native_reStructuredText_links_to_ikiwiki_pages.mdwn @@ -77,6 +77,9 @@ but disruptive since all .rst depend on it). Well, the customizations have to be picked and chosen from this, but at least the global python file can be very convenient. +> Did you consider just including the global rst header text into an item +> in the setup file? --[[Joey]] + Some rst-custom [examples are here](http://kaizer.se/wiki/rst_examples/) [rst-custom]: http://github.com/engla/ikiwiki/commits/rst-customize @@ -141,6 +144,11 @@ picture before it. >> use more rst-like syntax (and documents degrades better outside the wiki as >> noted). >> +>>> Unsure about the degredation argument. It will work some of +>>> the time, but ikiwiki's [[ikiwiki/subpage/linkingrules]] +>>> are sufficiently different from normal html relative link +>>> rules that it often won't work. --[[Joey]] +>> >> The named link syntax (just like the :wiki: role) are inspired from trac >> and a good fit, but only if the wiki is committed to using only rst, >> which I don't think is the case. @@ -165,9 +173,11 @@ picture before it. >> other phases? rst must be before any preprocess hook to avoid seeing any >> HTML. >> ->> With the presented changes, I already have a working RestructuredText ->> wiki, but I'm admitting that using .. raw:: html around all directives is ->> very ugly (I use few directives: inline, toggle, meta, tag, map) +>>> One of my long term goals is to refactor all the code in ikiwiki +>>> that manually runs the various stages of the render pipeline, +>>> into one centralized place. Once that's done, that place can get +>>> smart about what order to run the stages, and use a different +>>> order for rst. --[[Joey]] >> >> If I'm thinking right, processing to HTML already in filter means any >> processing in scan can be reused directly (or skipped if it's legal to @@ -175,6 +185,7 @@ picture before it. >> >> -- [[ulrik]] +>>> Seems it could be, yes. --[[Joey]] ### Implementation ### |