summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/doc/plugins/comments
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/plugins/comments')
-rw-r--r--doc/plugins/comments/discussion.mdwn3
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/plugins/comments/discussion.mdwn b/doc/plugins/comments/discussion.mdwn
index 59740ec37..2a87a3d93 100644
--- a/doc/plugins/comments/discussion.mdwn
+++ b/doc/plugins/comments/discussion.mdwn
@@ -63,6 +63,9 @@ spam problems. So, use `check_canedit` as at least a first-level check?
> This is why `anonok_pages => 'postcomment(*)'` and `locked_pages => '!postcomment(*)'`
> are necessary to allow anonymous and logged-in editing (respectively).
>
+>> I changed that to move the flag out of the page name, and into a variable that the `match_postcomment`
+>> function checks for. Other ugliness still applies. :-) --[[Joey]]
+>
> This is ugly - one alternative would be to add `check_permission()` that takes a
> page and a verb (create, edit, rename, remove and maybe comment are the ones I
> can think of so far), use that, and port the plugins you mentioned to use that