diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/todo/Moving_Pages.mdwn | 40 |
1 files changed, 34 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/doc/todo/Moving_Pages.mdwn b/doc/todo/Moving_Pages.mdwn index d93cea0a0..cd19d6b98 100644 --- a/doc/todo/Moving_Pages.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/Moving_Pages.mdwn @@ -370,8 +370,14 @@ When renaming `foo`, it probably makes sense to also rename `foo/Discussion`. Should other SubPages in `foo/` also be renamed? I think it's probably simplest to rename all of its SubPages too. +(For values of "simplest" that don't include the pain of dealing with all +the changed links on subpages.. as well as issues like pagespecs that +continue to match the old subpages, and cannot reasonably be auto-converted +to use the new, etc, etc... So still undecided about this.) + When deleting `foo`, I don't think SubPages should be deleted. The -potential for mistakes and abuse is too large. +potential for mistakes and abuse is too large. Deleting Discussion page +might be a useful exception. ## link fixups @@ -379,6 +385,18 @@ When renaming a page, it's desirable to keep links that point to it working. Rather than use redirection pages, I think that all pages that link to it should be modified to fix their links. +The rename plugin can add a "rename" hook, which other plugins can use to +update links &etc. The hook would be passed page content, the old and new +link names, and would modify the content and return it. At least the link +plugin should have such a hook. + +After calling the "rename" hook, and rendering the wiki, the rename plugin +can check to see what links remain pointing to the old page. There could +still be some, for example, CamelCase links probably won't be changed; img +plugins and others contain logical links to the file, etc. The user can be +presented with a list of all the pages that still have links to the old +page, and can manually deal with them. + In some cases, a redirection page will be wanted, to keep long-lived urls working. Since the meta plugin supports creating such pages, and since they won't always be needed, I think it will be simplest to just leave it up to @@ -390,15 +408,16 @@ The source page must be editable by the user to be deleted/renamed. When renaming, the dest page must not already exist, and must be creatable by the user, too. -When deleting/renaming attachments, the `allowed_attachments` PageSpec +lWhen deleting/renaming attachments, the `allowed_attachments` PageSpec is checked too. ## RCS -Two new functions are added to the RCS interface: +Three new functions are added to the RCS interface: * `rcs_remove(file)` * `rcs_rename(old, new)` +* `rcs_commit_staged(message, user, ip)` ## conflicts @@ -430,23 +449,32 @@ Cases that have to be dealt with: * Alice clicks "rename" button for a page; Bob makes a modification; Alice confirms rename. This case seems easy, it should just rename the modified page. + Update: it does * Alice opens edit UI for a page; Bob makes a modification; Alice clicks rename button and confirms rename. Seems same as previous case. + Update: check * Alice and Bob both try to rename a page at the same time (to probably different names). Or one tries to delete, and the other to rename. I think it's acceptible for the second one to get an error message that the page no longer exists. + Update: check, that happens * Alice renames a page; Bob had edit window open for it, and saves it afterwards, under old name. I think it's acceptible for Bob to succeed in saving it under the old name in this case, though not ideal. -* Alice renames (or deletes) a page. In the meantime, Bob is uploading an - attachment to it, and finishes after the rename finishes. Is it - acceptible for the attachment to be saved under the old name? + Update: Behavior is the same as if Alice renamed the page and Bob created + a new page with the old name. Seems acceptable, though could be mildly + confusing to Bob (or Alice). * Alice starts creating a new page. In the meantime, Bob renames a different page to that name. Alice should get an error message when committing; and it should have conflict markers. Ie, this should work the same as if Bob had edited the new page at the same time as Alice did. + Update: That should happen. Haven't tested this case yet to make sure. * Bob starts renaming a page. In the meantime, Alice creates a new page with the name he's renaming it to. Here Bob should get a error message that he can't rename the page to an existing name. (A conflict resolution edit would also be ok.) + Update: Bob gets an error message. + +* Alice renames (or deletes) a page. In the meantime, Bob is uploading an + attachment to it, and finishes after the rename finishes. Is it + acceptible for the attachment to be saved under the old name? |