diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/todo/tracking_bugs_with_dependencies.mdwn | 7 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/todo/tracking_bugs_with_dependencies.mdwn b/doc/todo/tracking_bugs_with_dependencies.mdwn index 1b99d70b5..5640de95a 100644 --- a/doc/todo/tracking_bugs_with_dependencies.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/tracking_bugs_with_dependencies.mdwn @@ -65,6 +65,8 @@ I like the idea of [[tips/integrated_issue_tracking_with_ikiwiki]], and I do so >>> If you memoize the outcomes of the named pagespecs you can make in O(N.X), no? >>> -- [[Will]] +>>>> Yeah, guess that'd work. :-) + > One quick further thought. All the above discussion assumes that 'dependency' is the > same as 'links to', which is not really true. For example, you'd like to be able to say > "This bug does not depend upon [ [ link to other bug ] ]" and not have a dependency. @@ -97,6 +99,11 @@ this todo [[todo/Add_a_plugin_to_list_available_pre-processor_commands]]. >> I've also been concerned about how globally defined pagespec shortcuts would interact with >> the page dependancy system. Your idea of internally defined shortcuts should fix that. -- [[Will]] +>>> You're correct, the refresh hook is run very early, before pagesources +>>> is populated. (It will be partially populated on a refresh, but will +>>> not be updated to reflect new pages.) Agree that internally defined +>>> seems the way to go. --[[Joey]] + Immediately below is a patch for IkiWiki.pm. Below that is a new plugin `definepagespec ` which behaves like `shortcut` for pagespecs. |