diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/todo/tracking_bugs_with_dependencies.mdwn | 32 |
1 files changed, 31 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/doc/todo/tracking_bugs_with_dependencies.mdwn b/doc/todo/tracking_bugs_with_dependencies.mdwn index 8b36f1e59..a3250f178 100644 --- a/doc/todo/tracking_bugs_with_dependencies.mdwn +++ b/doc/todo/tracking_bugs_with_dependencies.mdwn @@ -196,21 +196,39 @@ account all comments above (which doesn't mean it is above reproach :) ). --[[W > Very belated code review of last version of the patch: > > * `is_globlist` is no longer needed + +>> Good :) + > * I don't understand why the pagespec match regexp is changed > from having flags `igx` to `ixgs`. Don't see why you > want `.` to match '\n` in it, and don't see any `.` in the regexp > anyway? + +>> Because you have to define all the named pagespecs in the pagespec, you sometimes end up with very long pagespecs. I found it useful to split them over multiple lines. That didn't work at one point and I added the 's' to make it work. I may have further altered the regex since then to make the 's' redundant. Remove it and see if multi-line pagespecs still work. :) + > * Some changes of `@_` to `%params` in `pagespec_makeperl` do not > make sense to me. I don't see where \%params is defined and populated, > except with `\$params{specFunc}`. + +>> I'm not a perl hacker. This was a mighty battle for me to get going. There is probably some battlefield carnage from my early struggles learning perl left here. +>> Part of this is that @_ / @params already existed as a way of passing in extra parameters. I didn't want to pollute that top level namespace - just at my own parameter (a hash) which contained the data I needed. + > * Seems that the only reason `match_glob` has to check for `~` is > because when a named spec appears in a pagespec, it is translated > to `match_glob("~foo")`. If, instead, `pagespec_makeperl` checked > for named specs, it could convert them into `check_named_spec("foo")` > and avoid that ugliness. + +>> Yeah - I wanted to make named specs syntactically different on my first pass. You are right in that this could be made a fallback - named specs always override pagenames. + > * The changes to `match_link` seem either unecessary, or incomplete. > Shouldn't it check for named specs and call > `check_named_spec_existential`? + +>> An earlier version did. Then I realised it wasn't actually needed in that case - match_link() already included a loop that was like a type of existential matching. Each time through the loop it would +>> call match_glob(). match_glob() in turn will handle the named spec. I tested this version briefly and it seemed to work. I remember looking at this again later and wondering if I had mis-understood +>> some of the logic in match_link(), which might mean there are cases where you would need an explicit call to check_named_spec_existential() - I never checked it properly after having that thought. + > * Generally, the need to modify `match_*` functions so that they > check for and handle named pagespecs seems suboptimal, if > only because there might be others people may want to use named @@ -221,13 +239,25 @@ account all comments above (which doesn't mean it is above reproach :) ). --[[W > that is not a page name at all, and it could be weird > if such a parameter were accidentially interpreted as a named > pagespec. (But, that seems unlikely to happen.) + +>> Possibly. I'm not sure which I prefer between the current solution and that one. Each have advantages and disadvantages. +>> It really isn't much code for the match functions to add a call to check_named_spec_existential(). + > * I need to check if your trick to avoid infinite recursion > works if there are two named specs that recursively > call one-another. I suspect it does, but will test this > myself.. -> + +>> It worked for me. :) + > --[[Joey]] +>> There is one issue that I've been thinking about that I haven't raised anywhere (or checked myself), and that is how this all interacts with page dependencies. +>> Firstly, I'm not sure anymore that the `pagespec_merge` function will continue to work in all cases. Secondly, it seems that there are two types of dependency, and ikiwiki +>> currently only handles one of them. The first type is "Rebuild this page when any of these other pages changes" - ikiwiki handles this. The second type is "rebuild this page when +>> set of pages referred to by this pagespec changes" - ikiwiki doesn't seem to handle this. I suspect that named pagespecs would make that second type of dependency more +>> important. I'll try to come up with a good example. -- [[Will]] + ---- diff --git a/IkiWiki.pm b/IkiWiki.pm |