diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | doc/bugs/inline_sort_order_and_meta_date_value.mdwn | 28 |
1 files changed, 28 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/bugs/inline_sort_order_and_meta_date_value.mdwn b/doc/bugs/inline_sort_order_and_meta_date_value.mdwn new file mode 100644 index 000000000..8aea8d0ac --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/bugs/inline_sort_order_and_meta_date_value.mdwn @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ +I have a directory containing two files. f1 has + + meta date="2008-07-02 14:13:17" + +f2 has + + meta date="2008-07-02 21:04:21" + +They have both been modified recently: + + >>> stat(f1) + (33188, 459250L, 65027L, 1, 1000, 1000, 1686L, 1227967177, 1227966706, 1227966706) + >>> stat(f2) + (33188, 458868L, 65027L, 1, 1000, 1000, 938L, 1227967187, 1227966705, 1227966705) + +Note that f1 is fractionally newer than f2 in terms of ctime and mtime, but f2 is much newer in terms of the meta information. + +Another page includes them both via inline. The inclusion pagespec is not based on date, but on path (and the files are sorted into directories based on their dates) + + inline pages="2008/07/*/*" show=5 + +The resulting page is rendered with f1 above f2, seemingly not using the meta directive information. The italic-footer in the inline pages does use the correct time e.g. <em>Posted Wed 02 Jul 2008 14:13:17 BST</em>. + +If I instead include them using creation_year in the pagespec, they are ordered correctly. + +I'm working on importing a blosxom site into ikiwiki. I'll try and reproduce this online. + +-- [[JonDowland]] |